Deep brain stimulation in Latin America in comparison with the US and Europe in a real-world population: indications, demographics, techniques, technology, and adverse events

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to provide geographic comparisons of deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedures in Latin America with the US and Europe regarding primary indications, demographic information, clinical and device-related adverse events, technology used, and patient outcomes using the Medtronic Product Surveillance Registry data as of July 31, 2021. METHODS Two thousand nine hundred twelve patients were enrolled in the registry (2782 received DBS and 1580 are currently active). Fourteen countries contributed 44,100 years of device experience to the registry. DBS centers in Latin America are located in Colombia (n = 3), Argentina (n = 1), Brazil (n = 1), and Mexico (n = 1). Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the difference in proportions of categorical variables between regions. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for the EQ-5D index score change from baseline to follow-up. RESULTS The most common indication for DBS was Parkinson’s disease across all regions. In Latin America, dystonia was the second most common indication, compared to essential tremor in other regions. There was a striking finding with respect to age—patients were an average of 10 years younger at DBS implantation in Latin America. This difference was most likely due to the greater number of patients with dystonia receiving the device implants. The intraoperative techniques were quite similar, showing the same level of quality and covering the main principles of the surgeries with some variations in the brand of frames, planning software, and microrecording systems. Rechargeable batteries were significantly more common in Latin America (72.37%) than in the US (6.44%) and Europe (9.9%). Staging of the DBS procedure differed, with only 11.84% in Latin America staging the procedure compared with 97.58% and 34.86% in the US and Europe, respectively. The EQ-5D score showed significant improvements in all regions during the first 6–12 months (p < 0.0001). However, the 24-month follow-up only showed an improvement in the scale for Latin America (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS DBS was performed in Latin America with similar indications, techniques, and technology as in the US and Europe. Important differences were found, with Latin America implementing more regular use of rechargeable devices, including younger patients at the time of surgery, and showing more sustained quality of life improvements at 24 months of follow-up. The authors hypothesize that these disparities stem from differences in resources among regions. However, more studies are needed to standardize DBS practice across the world to improve patients’ quality of life and provide high-quality care.