Cerebral arteriovenous malformations

Author:

Luessenhop Alfred J.,Rosa Louis

Abstract

✓ To address the problems of surgical risk versus natural risk associated with cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVM's), and the role of the intravascular operative approach, the authors have assessed a 20-year experience with 450 patients. Results of direct surgery in 90 patients indicate that for the smaller AVM's (Grades I and II), mortality and morbidity rates are lower than a reasonably projected natural risk. Hence, these patients are candidates for surgery in most instances. However, for more extensive AVM's (Grades III and IV), consideration of anticipated future years of exposure to natural risk and the location of the AVM in the brain are necessary for determining operability. In general, neither seizures nor incipient focal neurological dysfunction alone are indications for surgery, and the risks of disability or death from hemorrhage after the fifth decade of life are probably less than the surgical risks by present operative techniques. Considering the usual age of patients at the time of diagnosis, it is estimated that surgical risk is currently less than the natural risk for about 65% to 70% of all AVM patients. The categories of AVM's in which the angiographic effectiveness of the intravascular approach is the greatest correspond to the same categories of AVM's that can be surgically removed with low risk. The intravascular approach is most useful for management of large AVM's causing progressive neurological dysfunction or as a preliminary step to surgery in selected cases in which access to major feeding arteries is difficult. The authors believe that the future of the intravascular approach should be directed toward transforming large inoperable AVM's into operable ones, but that the overall capability for this with acceptable risk is uncertain at present.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Cited by 207 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3