Proximal intracranial internal carotid artery branches: prevalence and importance for balloon occlusion test

Author:

Allen Jason W.,Alastra Anthony J. G.,Nelson Peter K.

Abstract

Object. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of angiographically identifiable skull base arterial branches that potentially serve as collateral conduits during a balloon occlusion test (BOT) of the internal carotid artery (ICA). The authors posited that neurological deficits in patients who had previously tolerated the occlusion test may be attributable to an unrecognized collateral support through these channels (operant during proximal ICA BOT) when permanent ICA occlusion was performed more distally. Methods. In 481 cases (962 ICAs), cerebral angiograms obtained during routine Wada testing were retrospectively reviewed. Two hundred sixty-one patients had at least one angiographically identifiable ICA branch; 109 patients had two or more branches. A meningohypophyseal branch of the cavernous ICA was identified on the right side in 108 patients and on the left in 122. A vidian artery originated from the petrous portion of the ICA on the right side in 58 patients and on the left in 85. The inferolateral trunk revealed itself as a branch of the cavernous ICA on the right side in 17 patients and on the left in 33. A caroticotympanic artery arose from a left cavernous ICA. A persistent trigeminal artery was situated on the right side in two patients and on the left in three. More than half of the patients had angiographically identifiable and perhaps hemodynamically significant skull base branches of the ICA, and approximately one quarter had more than one identifiable branch. Conclusions. The authors recommend that patients be screened during angiography studies performed prior to BOT in branches of the proximal intracranial ICA and that the site of BOT be moved distally if such branches are identified.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Cited by 39 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3