Optimizing radiotherapy strategies for skull base chordoma: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of treatment modalities and outcomes

Author:

Palavani Lucca B.1,Borges Pedro2,Andreão Filipi Fim3,Borges Jordana4,Batista Sávio3,Oliveira Leonardo B.5,Ferreira Márcio Yuri6,Reis Pedro C. Abrahão3,Pontes Julia7,Negri Herika8,Beer-Furlan Andre9,Krishna Chandan8,Bertani Raphael10,Rassi Marcio S.11

Affiliation:

1. Max Planck University Center, Indaiatuba, São Paulo, Brazil;

2. Technical-Educational Foundation Souza Marques, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;

3. Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;

4. Independent Researcher, Goiania, Goias, Brazil;

5. State University of Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil;

6. Ninth July University, São Paulo, Brazil;

7. State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;

8. Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona;

9. Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida;

10. University of São Paulo, Brazil; and

11. Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

OBJECTIVE In the treatment of skull base chordoma (SBC) surgery is considered the mainstay approach, and gross-total resection has an established relationship with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). However, the tumor’s location often interferes with attempts at complete resection. In this case, surgery for maximal resection followed by high-dose radiotherapy has been demonstrated to be the standard treatment. In this context, various modalities are available, yet no consensus exists on the most effective. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different radiotherapy modalities for SBC. METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors systematically searched for the treatment of SBC with radiation modalities in the PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases. Outcomes assessed for each modality were as follows: OS, PFS, local control (LC), and complications. The random-effects model was adopted. A single-proportion analysis with 95% CI was used to measure the effects in single-arm analysis. For the comparative analysis, the OR with 95% CI was used to compare outcome treatment effects. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS A total of 32 studies comprising 3663 patients, with 2322 patients who were treated with radiotherapeutic modalities, were included. Regarding 5-year OS findings in each modality study, the findings were as follows: in photon fractionated radiotherapy, an estimated rate of 77% (69%–84%, 568 patients); in conventional fractionated radiotherapy, 76% (65%–87%, 517 cases); in proton-based + carbon ion–based radiotherapy, 85% (82%–88%, 622 cases); and in a comparative analysis of proton-based and carbon ion–based therapy, there was an OR of 1.2 (95% CI 0.59–2.43, 306 cases). Regarding the 5-year PFS estimate, the rates were as follows: 35% (26%–45%, 95 cases) for photon fractionated therapy; 35% (25%–45%, 85 cases) for stereotactic radiotherapy; 77% (50%–100%, 180 cases) for proton-based and carbon ion–based radiotherapy; and 74% (45%–100%, 102 cases) for proton-based radiotherapy. Regarding LC in periods of 3 and 5 years after proton- and carbon ion–based therapy, the overall estimated rates were 84% (78%–90%, 326 cases) and 75% (65%–85%, 448 cases), respectively. For proton-based radiotherapy and carbon ion–based therapy, the 5-year LC rates were 76% (67%–86%, 259 cases) and 75% (59%–91%, 189 cases), respectively. CONCLUSIONS The analysis highlights the finding that particle-based modalities like proton beam radiotherapy and carbon ion radiotherapy are the most effective radiation therapies available for the treatment of SBC. Furthermore, it reinforces the idea that surgery followed by radiotherapy constitutes the standard treatment.

Publisher

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group (JNSPG)

Reference61 articles.

1. Chordomas and cartilaginous tumors at the skull base;Heffelfinger MJ,1973

2. Fifty years of experience with chordomas in southeast Scotland;O’Neill P,1985

3. Chordoma: incidence and survival patterns in the United States, 1973-1995;McMaster ML,2001

4. Skull base chordomas review of current treatment paradigms;Yaniv D,2020

5. Radiotherapeutic factors in the management of cervical-basal chordomas and chondrosarcomas;Noël G,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3