Abstract
Humans are really good at resolving ambiguities. Our senses are trained for it: is that pattern of shadows in the forest dappled sunlight, or a tiger waiting to pounce? Our minds quickly and almost effortlessly adjust interpretations based on contextual clues that change over time. Parsers? Not so much. Our everyday languages and formats: XML, JSON, JavaScript, Java, etc. are rigorously defined to avoid ambiguity: you must put a quote here, a semicolon there. (Most) parsers reject anything that cannot be unambiguously identified within a small textual window. Invisible XML is an uncommon format in that it doesn’t reject grammars or parses that are ambiguous. That doesn’t mean ambiguity is a good thing, and it doesn’t mean authors wouldn’t like to control it.
Publisher
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Pulse, Parse, and Ponder;Balisage Series on Markup Technologies
2. Knock Down This Wall;Balisage Series on Markup Technologies