Affiliation:
1. CANAKKALE ONSEKIZ MART UNIVERSITY
2. Alpi Diş Hastaneleri
Abstract
Background: In order to reduce post-operative failure and ensure successful rehabilitation, patients scheduled for dental implant treatment are often evaluated pre-operatively using radiographic images in addition to clinical examination. This study aimed to investigate the reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the pre-implant site assessment.
Methods: Panoramic images of 150 patients with the total of the 396 implants placed in the maxilla (n=165) and mandible (n=231), were examined in the study. Radiographic measurements (vertical and horizontal) were recorded on the computer using the automatic calibration tab for each radiograph and compared with the actual implant dimensions. Moreover, the effects of location, gender, and change in dimensions on magnification rate (MR) were also investigated. The measurements were made by two experienced observers.
Results: Panoramic vertical measurements were significantly higher in both the maxilla and mandible compared to the actual implant lengths (p
Publisher
Archives of Current Medical Research
Reference14 articles.
1. Kim YK, Park JY, Kim SG, Kim JS, Kim JD. Magnification rate of digital panoramic radiographs and its effectiveness for pre-operative assessment of dental implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(2):76-83.
2. Siu ASC, Chu FCS, Li TKL, Chow TW, Deng F. Imaging modalities for preoperative assessment in dental implant therapy: an overview. Hong Kong Dent J. 2010;7:23-30.
3. Mengel R, Candir M, Shiratori K, Flores-de-Jacoby L. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of periodontal defects: an in vitro study on native pig and human mandibles. J Periodontol. 2005;76(5):665-73.
4. Mengel R, Kruse B, Flores-de-Jacoby L. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects: an in vitro study on native pig mandibles. J Periodontol. 2006;77(7):1234-41.
5. Tohnak S, Mehnert AJ, Mahoney M, Crozier S. Synthesizing dental radiographs for human identification. J Dent Res. 2007;86(11):1057-62.