Development and validation of a survival nomogram for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the elderly: using competing risk models and propensity matching to apply the prediction tool

Author:

Zhanghuang Chenghao,Zhang Zhaoxia,Jiang Hongchao,Wang Jinkui,Yao Zhigang,Ji Fengming,Wu Chengchuang,Yang Zhen,Xie Yucheng,Tang Haoyu,Yan Bing

Abstract

Aim: Patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) have a low survival rate, with a 5-year survival of approximately 45%, regardless of the treatment received. The risk of death within 5 years after radical cystectomy in patients with MIBC remains as high as 60%. Over 80% of patients with bladder cancer are over 65. Therefore, identifying prognostic correlates associated with radical cystectomy in older patients with MIBC could improve survival rates. In addition, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are particularly important as adjuvant treatments for MIBC patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Therefore, this study aimed to find risk factors for cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) after radical cystectomy in elderly MIBC patients. The difference in survival between radiotherapy and chemotherapy was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves to provide theoretical support for whether radiotherapy is recommended for such patients. Methods: Patients 65 or older diagnosed with MIBC with radical cystectomy between 2004-2018 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. 2004-2015 patients were subjected to column line plot production and internal validation, and 2016-2018 patients were subjected to external temporal validation. A single-factor COX regression model was first used to screen for prognostic correlates. Then a multi-factor COX regression model was used to screen for independent risk factors. A nomogram was constructed by using independent risk factors. The accuracy and reliability of the nomogram were examined using calibration curves, consistency index (C-index), and area under subjects (AUC) as operational characteristic curves. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to evaluate the clinical value of the prediction model. Results: A total of 11,557 patients were included in this study, divided into training set (N = 4,712), validation set (N = 4,810) and external validation set (N = 2,035). Multivariate COX regression models showed that chemotherapy, radiotherapy, TNM stage, race, and age were independent risk factors for CSS and OS patients. We constructed a nomogram to predict CSS and OS in elderly MIBC patients undergoing radical cystectomy. The C-indexes were 0.692 (95%CI: 0.680-0.704) and 0.690 (95%CI: 0.678-0.702) for the CSS training and validation sets, respectively, and 0.674 for the OS training and validation sets (95%CI: 0.664-0.684) and 0.672 (95%CI: 0.662-0.682) for the OS training and validation sets, respectively. The C-index of the external validation set CSS was 0.731 (95%CI: 709-0.753), and that of OS was 0.721 (95%CI: 0.701-0.741), indicating that the nomogram prediction model has good discriminative power. The calibration curves and AUC also suggested that the nomogram had good accuracy and discrimination. In addition, the KM curves of propensity-matched pre- and post-radiotherapy showed that radiotherapy was detrimental to patient survival. Meanwhile, chemotherapy favored OS and short-term CSS but not long-term CSS. Conclusions: We established a nomogram to predict the CSS and OS in elderly MIBC patients undergoing radical cystectomy. After internal cross-validation and external validation, the nomogram prediction model showed good accuracy and reliability, and the DCA results showed that the nomogram has good clinical value. In addition, this study gave good suggestions on whether radiotherapy or chemotherapy is necessary for radical cystectomy in elderly MIBC patients.

Publisher

OAE Publishing Inc.

Subject

General Medicine,General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science,General Medicine,Ocean Engineering,General Medicine,General Medicine,General Medicine,General Medicine,General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3