1. Beaton, A. E. (1987).The NAEP 1983-84fechn 1cal report (No. 15-TR-20). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, Natlonal Assessment of Educational Pmgress.
2. Beaton, A. E , & Zwick, R. (1990). The effect of changes in the nahonal assessment.Disentanglrng the NAEP 1985-86 reading a n o d y (Report No. 17-TR-21). Princeton, NJ. Educational Testing Service, Natronal Assessment of Educational hogress.
3. Bureau of the Census (1994). School enroilment-Social and economrc characteristics of students. October 1993. Waslungton, DC. U.S. Department of Commerce (Series P-20, No. 479)
4. Campbell, J. R., Lazer, S. & MuIIis, I. V. S. (1994). Dewtoping the NAEP objectives, items and background questions for the 1992 assessments of reading, mathematics, and writing In E.G. Johnson, J E. Carlson, et al., The NAEP 1992 Technical Report (Rep No. 23-TR20; pp. 33-66). Washington, DC National Center for Education Statistics,