1. Andwson, L. M. (1981). Students" response to seatwork: Implications for the study of cognitive p r o c ~ ~ v s (Research Saia No. 102). Ea~t Lansing: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.
2. Andmon. R. C. & Biddle. W. B. (1975). On asking people questions about what they are reading.In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol.9, pp. 89-133). New York: Acadanic.
3. Anderson. R. C., Shirey. L. L. Wilson, P. T. & Fielding. L. G. (1987). Intcrestingnms of children's reading material.In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning and instruction: Comtive and affective process anaiyses (Vol.3, pp. 287-299). Hisdirle, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assodates. Inc.
4. Anderson, T. H. (1980). Study strategies and adjunct aids.In R. J. Spiro. C. Bnrce, It W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical imra in reading comprehurrwn (pp. 483-502). Hillsdak. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Inc.
5. Effects of Inconsistent Information on Text Processing: Evidence for Comprehension Monitoring