What is "Good"Technical Communication? A Comparison of the Standards of Writing and Engineering Instructors-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

What is "Good"Technical Communication? A Comparison of the Standards of Writing and Engineering Instructors

Published:2003-01-01 Issue:1 Volume:12 Page:7-24
ISSN:1057-2252
Container-title:Technical Communication Quarterly
language:en
Short-container-title:Technical Communication Quarterly

Author:

Smith Summer

Publisher

Informa UK Limited

Subject

Communication,Education

Link

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1207/s15427625tcq1201_2

Reference17 articles.

1. Charney, Davida. "A Study in Rhetorical Reading: How Evolutionists Read `The Spandrels of San Marco." " Understanding Scientific Prose. Ed. Jack Selzer. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1993. 203-223 1.

2. Ericsson, K. A., and Herbert Simon. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports QS Data. Rev. ed. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. “Five Diamond Standards”: A Rhetorical and Quantitative Analysis of Verbiage in Luxury Hotel and Restaurant Five Diamond Service Standards;Proceedings of the 41st ACM International Conference on Design of Communication;2023-10-26

2. Getting to “How Do You Know?” Rather Than “So What?” From “What's New?”;Technical Communication Quarterly;2014-12-24

3. Perceptions and Practices: A Survey of Professional Engineers and Architects;ISRN Education;2012-03-28

4. “I Really Don't Know What He Meant by That”: How Well Do Engineering Students Understand Teachers' Comments on Their Writing?;Technical Communication Quarterly;2011-03-16

5. Comments on Lab Reports by Mechanical Engineering Teaching Assistants;Journal of Business and Technical Communication;2007-10