1. Amicus brief for the case of State of New Jersey v. Michaels presented by Committee of Concerned Social Scientists.
2. Bull, R. (1995). Innovative techniques forthequestioningofchild witnesses, especially those who are young and those with a learning disability.In M. Zaragoza, J. R. Gmham G. C. N. Hall, R. Hirschman, & Y. S. Ben-Porath(Eds.), Memoryandtestimony in the child witness @p. 179-194). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Ceci, S. J. & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4. Dent, H. R. (1982). The effects of interviewing strategies on the results of interviews with child witnesses.In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials (pp. 279-297). Stockholm: Norstedt.
5. The Child Witness: An Introduction