The online questionnaire as a data production device in health research

Author:

Ferigato Sabrina Helena,Teixeira Ricardo Rodrigues,Moreira Junior Jair de Souza,Togashi Giovanna Benjamin,Andrade Andresa Caravage de,Santos Rogério da Costa,Boaro Julio

Abstract

This article aims to present and discuss an experience of applying an online questionnaire (QOL) as a data production device in the universe of health research. This is a survey carried out in a partnership between the Faculty of Medicine of USP and the Research and Training Center of Sesc São Paulo, which proposed to develop a new concept of an online questionnaire, aimed at capturing the life experience of respondents during the period of the Covid-19 pandemic. Based on the theoretical-methodological framework of intervention research, the results of this experience point to the proposition of an in-depth questionnaire, based on the use of different communication techniques and the active incorporation in its form and content of at least 4 dimensions that are inseparable from the production of knowledge in health: (1) its ethical-investigative dimension, (2) the clinical dimension, (3) the aesthetic-communicational dimension and (4) its political dimension. It is concluded that, with the growing process of virtualization of life – which is also expressed in investigative processes in health – the reinvention of online data production techniques can be presented as a strategy for the creation of innovative processes in academic production, which allow for an extensive and plural increase in samples, without losing depth in the production of knowledge and care.

Publisher

Revista Cientifica Multidisciplinar Nucleo Do Conhecimento

Subject

General Medicine

Reference21 articles.

1. GIL, Antonio Carlos. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 5. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 1999.

2. MCGUIRK, Pauline M.; O’NEILL, Phillip. Using questionnaires in qualitative human geography. 2016. In I. Hay (orgs). Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography (pp. 246-273). Don Mills, Canada: Oxford University Press, 2016. p 246-273. Disponível em: https://ro.uow.edu.au/sspapers/2518

3. CHAER, Galdino; DINIZ, Rafael Rosa Pereira; RIBEIRO, Elisa Antônia. A técnica do questionário na pesquisa educacional. Evidência, Araxá, v. 7, n. 7, pp. 251-266, 2011.

4. RAMJAN, Lucie M.; FOGARTY, Sarah. Clients’ perceptions of the therapeutic relationship in the treatment of anorexia nervosa: qualitative findings from an online questionnaire. Australian Journal of Primary Health. v. 25, n. 1, pp. 37-42. 2019. Disponível em: 10.1071/PY18032.

5. GRAY, Lisa M.; et al. Expanding qualitative research interviewing strategies: zoom video communications. The Qualitative Report. v. 25 n.5, pp. 1292-1301. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4212

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3