Biomechanical aspects of the initial stability of instrumental fixation in the treatment of subaxial cervical dislocations: an experimental study
-
Published:2021-09-15
Issue:3
Volume:18
Page:43-52
-
ISSN:2313-1497
-
Container-title:Hirurgiâ pozvonočnika (Spine Surgery)
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Hir. pozvonoč.
Author:
Lastevsky A. D.1ORCID, Popelyukh A. I.2ORCID, Veselov S. V.2ORCID, Bataev V. A.2ORCID, Rerikh V. V.3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics n.a. Ya.L. Tsivyan
17 Frunze str., Novosibirsk, 630091, Russia 2. Novosibirsk State Technical University
20, build. 5 Marksa prospekt, Novosibirsk, 630073, Russia 3. Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics n.a. Y.L. Tsivyan; Professor of traumatology and orthopedics in Novosibirsk State Medical University
17 Frunze str., Novosibirsk, 630091, Russia;
52 Krasny Prospect, Novosibirsk, 630091, Russia
Abstract
Objective. To study the influence of thoracic inlet angle (TIA) and the fracture of the articular process on the initial strength of the fixation of the spinal segment during its anterior and circular instrumental surgical stabilization in an experiment on a model of the lower cervical spinal segment.Material and Methods. The material of the study was assembled models of C6–C7 spinal segments made using addictive technologies by 3D printing. After preliminary instrumentation, spinal segments were installed on the stand testing machine using specially manufactured equipment. A metered axial load simulating the native one was applied along the axis of the parameters SVA COG–C7 and C2–C7 SVA, which values were close to the value of 20 mm, at a rate of 1 mm/min until the shear strain was reached. The system’s resistance to displacement was measured, and the resulting load was evaluated. Four study groups were formed depending on the modeling of the T1 slope parameter, the integrity of the facets, and the type of instrumentation. Three tests were conducted in each group. The graphical curves were analyzed, and the values of the parameters of the neutral and elastic zones, the yield point, time to yield point, and the value of the applied load for the implementation of shear displacement were recorded. The data were subjected to comparative analysis.Results. In Group 1, anterior shear displacement of the C6 vertebra could not be induced in all series. In groups 2, 3, and 4 a shear displacement of ≥4 mm was noted in all series. In Group 3 where a fracture of the articular process was additionally modeled, the average value of the yield point was 423.5 ± 46.8 N. Elastic zone, the time to the onset of the yield point, the time at the end point or at a shear of C6 ≥4 mm did not differ significantly. In Group 4, a translational displacement of ≥4 mm was observed, though the average yield point was 1536.0 ± 40.0 N.Conclusion. The direction of the load applied to the fixed spinal segment, as well as the presence of damage to the articular processes, play a crucial role in maintaining resistance to shear deformation of the spinal segment during its instrumental stabilization. At high values of TIA (T1 slope) and the presence of fractures of the articular processes, the isolated anterior stabilization is less effective, circular fixation of 360° under these conditions gives a high initial stability to the spinal segment.
Publisher
Association of Spine Surgeons
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery
Reference37 articles.
1. Aebi M, Zuber K, Marchesi D. Treatment of cervical spine injuries with anterior plating. Indications, techniques, and results. Spine. 1991;16(3 Suppl):S38–S45. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199103001-00008. 2. Allen BL Jr, Ferguson RL, Lehmann TR, Obrien RP. A mechanistic classification of closed, indirect fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical spine. Spine. 1982;7: 3. –27. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198200710-00001. 4. Koller H, Reynolds J, Zenner J, Forstner R, Hempfing A, Maislinger I, Kolb K, Tauber M, Resch H, Mayer M, Hitzl W. Mid- to long-term outcome of instrumented anterior cervical fusion for subaxial injuries. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:630–653. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0879-3. 5. Yang JS, Liu P, Liu TJ, Zhang HP, Zhang ZP, Yan L, Tuo Y, Chen H, Zou P, Li QD, Zhao YT, Hao DJ. When is the circumferential stabilization necessary for subaxial cervical fracture dislocations? The posterior ligament-bone injury classification and severity score: a novel treatment algorithm. Eur Spine J. 2021;30:524–533. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06580-8.
|
|