Affiliation:
1. Tyumen Regional Clinical Hospital No. 2
75 Melnikaite str., Tyumen, 625039, Russia
Abstract
Objective. To analyze the known classifications of infectious and inflammatory lesions of the cervical spine using the example of the author’s clinical material.Material and Methods. Data on the results of treatment of 24 patients with lesions of the cervical spine were analyzed. Classifications proposed by groups of authors led by L. Homagk (2016) E. Pola (2017), M. Akbar (2012) and H. Almansour (2020) were used for comparison.Results. Out of 24 patients with osteomyelitis of the cervical spine, monosegmental lesions were observed in 15, polysegmental – in 5, multilevel – in 2, and multilevel polysegmental lesions – in 2 cases. The C5–C6 segment was affected in 70.8 % of cases. Sepsis was diagnosed in 2 (8.3 %) patients. One case was not classified, as there was a lesion of the C1–C2 segment. The total number of neurological deficit was 16 (66.7 %). Twenty (83.3 %) patients were admitted with the acute form of the disease, and 4 (16.7 %) patients with the chronic form. Surgery was performed in 20 (83.3 %) patients. Hospital mortality was 8.3 % (n = 2), 91.7 % (n = 22) of patients recovered. The analysis of the classifications presented above was carried out, and proposals for their use were outlined.Conclusion. «New Classification of Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis» by Pola et al., a modified classification with specification of instability criteria and adaptation of surgical methods of treatment for the cervical spine allows applying it as the main treatment and diagnostic algorithm.
Publisher
Association of Spine Surgeons
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery
Reference25 articles.
1. Homagk L, Homagk N, Klauss JR, Roehl K, Hofmann GO, Marmelstein D. Spondylodiscitis severity code: scoring system for the classification and treatment of non-specific spondylodiscitis. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:1012–1020. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3936-8.
2. Homagk L, Homagk N, Meise HJ, Hofmann GO, Marmelstein DA. A Spondylodiscitis scoring system: SponDT – spondylodiscitis diagnosis and treatment. JSM Spine. 2016;1:1004. Available from: https://www. jscimedcentral.com/Spine/spine-1-1004.pdf.
3. Pola E, Autore G, Formica VM, Pambianco V, Colangelo D, Cauda R, Fantoni M. New classification for the treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis: validation study on a population of 250 patients with a follow-up of 2 years. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(Suppl 4):479–488. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5043-5.
4. Appalanaidu N, Shafafy R, Gee C, Brogan K, Karmani S, Morassi G, Elsayed S. Predicting the need for surgical intervention in patients with spondylodiscitis: the Brighton Spondylodiscitis Score (BSDS). Eur Spine J. 2019;28:751–761. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5775-x.
5. Almansour H, Pepke W, Akbar M. Pyogenic spondylodiscitis: The quest towards a clinical-radiological classification. Orthopade. 2020;49:482–493. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-019-03836-0.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献