Prediction of Wheat Yield and Protein Using Remote Sensors on Plots—Part I: Assessing near Infrared Model Robustness for Year and Site Variations

Author:

Øvergaard Stein I.12,Isaksson Tomas3,Korsaeth Audun1

Affiliation:

1. The Norwegian Institute for Agricultural and Environmental Research, Arable Crops Division, NO-2849 Kapp, Norway

2. The Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Mathematical Sciences and Technology, 1430 As, Norway

3. The Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, 1430 Ås, Norway

Abstract

Validation of reflectance-based prediction models for plant properties is often performed on just one or two years of data. Hence, we aimed to perform a more comprehensive study regarding the validation of prediction models for grain yield and protein concentration. A FieldSpec3 portable field spectroradiometer was used to measure canopy reflectance in spring wheat. Spectral reflectance data were collected from three different experimental locations in up to four different years during the period 2007–2010, so that seven unique site years were included, comprising, altogether, 976 individual plots. Several datasets had moderate to severe lodging, which had a markedly negative influence on the prediction results. To correct for this problem, a classification model for the classes “lodging” and “standing crop” was calibrated from the spectral data. The model gave a total classification accuracy of 98.3%. Prediction models for grain yield and grain protein concentration were computed by means of the recent statistical method powered partial least squares (PPLS). Models were calibrated and validated on several combinations of the spectral datasets in order to reveal spatial and temporal effects on the prediction performance. The model performance generally increased with increasing variation in the calibration data, both in time (i.e. more years included) and space (i.e. more sites included). The best model for grain yield explained 94% [root mean square error of prediction ( RMSEP) = 156g m−2] of the variance and the predictions of grain protein concentration explained 67% [ RMSEP=1.51 g dry matter (DM)100g−1] of the variance. The performance of the grain yield PPLS models was compared with that of models based on some widely used vegetation indices [normalised difference vegetation index (NDVI), modified soil adjusted vegetation index (MSAVI), red edge inflection point (REIP) and d-chl-ab]. The explained variance of the models based on vegetation indices did not exceed 55%, indicating that these models were inferior to full spectrum models. This study shows that one or two years of spectral measurement are insufficient for building fully operational models for cereal property predictions.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Spectroscopy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3