Effects of Different Types of Root Canal Irrigation Solutions on the Viability of the Human Osteoblastic Cell Line-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Effects of Different Types of Root Canal Irrigation Solutions on the Viability of the Human Osteoblastic Cell Line

Published:2022-09-01 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:2687-2781
Container-title:Akdeniz Medical Journal
language:tr
Short-container-title:Akd Tıp D

Author:

BÜYÜKÖZER ÖZKAN Hatice¹,ÇELİK Ayşe Canan Tutku²,ÜLKER Hayriye Esra³

Affiliation:

1. Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Anabilim Dalı, Antalya, Türkiye

2. Özel Çelik Diş Polikliniği, Uzman Diş Hekimi, İstanbul, Türkiye.

3. Selçuk Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı, Konya,

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: Root canal irrigation is very important for successful root canal treatment. During this procedure, root dentin and periapical tissues are in contact with irrigation solutions. These solutions should ideally remove pulpal tissues without damaging the oral tissues. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of 7 different irrigation solutions (Rocanal, BioPure MTAD, SmearClear, chlorhexidine gluconate, EDTA, hydrogen peroxide, NaOCl) on the viability of human osteoblastic cell lines (SaOS-2). Methods: The tested solutions were diluted with culture medium and prepared in 6 different concentrations (1:2, 1:4, 1:8, 1:16, and 1:32). SaOS-2 cells were exposed to all concentrations of irrigation solutions, respectively (n = 12). Cell culture medium without test material was used as a control group. Cell viability was evaluated with the MTT cytotoxicity test. The cell viability of the control group was equal to 100%, and the data were statistically evaluated by One-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey's HSD tests. Results: All tested solutions had cytotoxic effects on SaOS-2 cells at all concentrations (P < 0.05). There was difference in percentage between the cell viability values of the materials (P

Publisher

Akdeniz University

Reference62 articles.

1. 1. Ricucci D, Siqueira JF. Biofilms and apical periodontitis: study of prevalence and association with clinical and histopathologic findings. J Endod 2010; 36(8): 1277-88.

2. 2. Bystrom A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root-canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res 1981; 89(4): 321-28.

3. 3. Abou-Rass M, Piccinino MV. The effectiveness of four clinical irrigation methods on the removal of root canal debris. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982; 54(3):323-8.

4. 4. Peters LB, Wesselink PR, Buijs JF, van Winkelhoff AJ. Viable bacteria in root dentinal tubules of teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod. 2001; 27(2):76-81.

5. 5. Nair PN, Henry S, Cano V, Vera J. Microbial status of apical root canal system of human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after "one-visit" endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 99(2): 231-52.