Medical students’ experiences and perspectives on simulation-based education

Author:

Ensor Nicholas1,Sivasubramaniam Mithila2,Laird Ashleigh J.1,Roddis Bridget1,Qin Kirby R.1,Pacilli Maurizio1,Nestel Debra3,Nataraja Ramesh M.1

Affiliation:

1. 1Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

2. 2Department of Paediatric Surgery, Monash Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

3. 4Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Abstract

We aimed to gain insight into student experiences of simulation-based education (SBE), particularly in regards to (1) current provision of SBE, (2) learning opportunities and (3) areas for improvements, innovation and focused initiatives. This was to create focussed initiatives that can assess and address specific needs to improve SBE for learners and educators alike. Medical students were surveyed with 41 questions on their experiences of SBE using an 11-point Likert scale (0 – strongly disagree, 10 – strongly agree). Results were analysed by individual questions and presented as median (interquartile range) or percentage ( 246 students participated, with 76.0% (187/246) completing all questions. 99.2% of students (235/237) had participated in SBE. The most valuable elements of SBE were learning a new skill under supervision (90.3%, 187/207), applying prior knowledge to a clinical scenario (73.4%, 152/187) and identifying gaps in knowledge/skill (73.4%, 152/187). Simulation was thought to improve medical knowledge (95.2%, 218/229) and technical skills (87.3%, 200/229). Twenty-one per cent (41/197) of students reported a negative experience and 23.5% (48/204) felt anxious. Students strongly agreed that simulation was beneficial to their training (9 [8–10]) and that there should be more SBE (8.5 [8–10]). Medical students find SBE accessible and valuable to their education. By analysing student perspectives (such as self-reported negative experience), targeted areas for further research and focussed initiatives can be implemented.

Publisher

Adi Health+Wellness

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3