Correlation between parameters influencing skill acquisition in cataract surgery simulation

Abstract

Introduction The EyeSi (Haag-Streit, Manheim, Germany) cataract surgery simulator is the most commonly used virtual reality simulator internationally to train Ophthalmology registrars. It consists of a Cataract Challenge Course (CCC), which is a virtual reality simulation (VRS) of cataract surgery. In this study, we aimed to determine any correlation between the parameters measured on the EyeSi virtual reality cataract surgery simulator and if they can predict the progression of microsurgical skill acquisition and development amongst ophthalmology trainees. Methods Data on the performance of 56 Ophthalmology trainees (training ophthalmic surgeons) at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital were analysed from 2018 to 2022. The trainees ranged from first to fourth year of training. Analysed parameters included Initial Task Performance, Time to Gate (the time to reach a threshold score – 50% in this case), and Peak Performance. Relationships between the parameters were analysed with Pearson r, and the significance of the difference between correlations was analysed with the psych package in R. Results The strongest correlation was found between initial and peak performance (r = 0.810), which was significantly greater than the correlation between Initial Task Performance and Time-to-Gate (r = 0.553, p = 0.03). Time-to-Gate was weakly correlated with Peak Performance (r = 0.475). The average total training time was 1123 minutes, ranging from 252 to 2039, and the mean peak CCC score was 442, ranging from 166 to 496. Conclusions Time-to-Gate, Initial Task Performance and Peak Performance are interlinked, indicating that trainees with the highest initial performance remain ahead in ability and can progress through VRS training more rapidly. Data also indicated that the EyeSi platform ultimately prioritizes a wide range of skills over mastery of a few – as participants who spend longer on ‘perfecting’ each stage of the simulator are not truly rewarded points-wise in comparison to those who rush through stages, as rushing through stages grants trainees a far higher overall score for each section (with one’s score ideally being a numeric representation of one’s ‘ability’). Consequently, the authors believe that virtual reality systems play a crucial role in training surgical registrars. However, their scoring systems should focus on skill mastery to facilitate maximal acquisition of skills.