Transformative forms of simulation in health care – the seven simulation-based ‘I’s: a concept taxonomy review of the literature

Author:

Weldon Sharon Marie1,Buttery Andy Graham2,Spearpoint Ken3,Kneebone Roger4

Affiliation:

1. 1School of Health Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, United Kingdom

2. 2Institute of Medical Sciences, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, United Kingdom

3. 3Medicine, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom

4. 4Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Simulation for non-pedagogical purposes has begun to emerge. Examples include quality improvement initiatives, testing and evaluating of new interventions, the co-designing of new models of care, the exploration of human and organizational behaviour, comparing of different sectors and the identification of latent safety threats. However, the literature related to these types of simulation is scattered across different disciplines and has many different associated terms, thus making it difficult to advance the field in both recognition and understanding. This paper, therefore, aims to enhance and formalize this growing field by generating a clear set of terms and definitions through a concept taxonomy of the literature. Due to the lack of alignment in terminology, a combination of pearl growing, snowballing and citation searching approach was taken. The search was conducted between November 2020 and March 2023. Data were extracted and coded from the included papers according to seven Simulation-Based I’s (SBIs; Innovation, Improvement, Intervention, Involvement, Identification, Inclusion and Influence). Eighty-three papers were identified from around the world, published from 2008 to 2023. Just over half were published in healthcare simulation journals. There were 68 different terms used to describe this form of simulation. Papers were categorized according to a primary and secondary Simulation-Based ‘I’. The most common primary SBI was Simulation-Based Identification. Selected categorized papers formed a descriptive narrative for each SBI. This review and taxonomy has revealed the breadth of an emerging and distinct field within healthcare simulation. It has identified the rate at which this field is growing, and how widespread it is geographically. It has highlighted confusion in terminology used to describe it, as well as a lack of consistency in how it is presented throughout the literature. This taxonomy has created a grounding and step change for this work which is embedded in the literature, providing a rich and varied resource of how it is being utilized globally.

Publisher

Adi Health+Wellness

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Global consensus statement on simulation-based practice in healthcare;Virtual Technologies in Medicine;2024-06-28

2. Cultivating cultural humility through healthcare simulation-based education: a scoping review protocol;International Journal of Healthcare Simulation;2024-06-03

3. Global consensus statement on simulation-based practice in healthcare;International Journal of Healthcare Simulation;2024-05-23

4. Global consensus statement on simulation-based practice in healthcare;Advances in Simulation;2024-05-21

5. The ASPiH Standards – 2023: guiding simulation-based practice in health and care;International Journal of Healthcare Simulation;2024-05-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3