Abstract
Engineers are currently facing questions about the use of geographic information systems or software to implement projects in a short time. The problem with using geographic information systems in construction is the relevance of the available data. An example is open sources with satellite images. This problem appeared even before satellite-positioning systems emerged. In this connection, the purpose of this article is to find the deviation of source points when performing photogrammetry with marker detection in Agisoft PhotoScan software. This method of determining coordinates using a single point and its correlation on the ground is applicable in the case of rapid calculations, where the volumes of earth masses are large enough and do not require increased accuracy at the stage of approximate calculations. As a result of the comparison of traditional and automated methods of definition of coordinates on the ground has been found an essential distinction, both in total values and in time spent for the definition of points of coordinates. The considerable difference revealed by the results of the comparison of coordinates is presented in the table as a color gradation. The average deviation between known coordinates and coordinates obtained in Agisoft PhotoScan by axes was: X=0.87%, Y=0.45%, Z=0.12%.
Reference13 articles.
1. Efficiency optimization and quality control of engineering geodesy processes in civil engineering [Text] / V. Berkhahn, F. Berner, H. Kutterer, V. Schwieger, J. Hirschner, I. Rehr, N. Rinke, J. Schweitzer // BAUINGENIEUR. — 2010. — Vol. 85. — P. 491–501.
2. UAS Point Cloud Accuracy Assessment Using Structure from Motion–Based Photogrammetry and PPK Georeferencing Technique for Building Surveying Applications [Text] / J.G. Martinez, G. Albeaino, M. Gheisari, W. Volkmann, L.F. Alarcón // Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering. — 2021. — Vol. 35, No. 1. — P. 05020004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000936
3. Web-Based Architecture for Automating Quantity Surveying Construction Cost Calculation [Text] / J.H. Yousif, S. N. Abdul Majeed, F. J. I. Al Azzawi // Infrastructures. — 2020. — Vol. 5, No. 6. — P. 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures5060045
4. Geometric accuracy investigations of terrestrial laser scanner systems in the laboratory and in the field [Text] / T.P. Kersten, M. Lindstaedt // Applied Geomatics. — 2022. — Vol. 14, No. 2. — P. 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-022-00442-2
5. Assessing the Accuracy of High Resolution Digital Surface Models Computed by PhotoScan® and MicMac® in Sub-Optimal Survey Conditions [Text] / M. Jaud, S. Passot, R. Le Bivic, C. Delacourt, P. Grandjean, N. Le Dantec // Remote Sensing. — 2016. — Vol. 8, No. 6. — P. 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8060465