Comparison of different cool season cereal species and cultivars in terms of straw yield and quality

Author:

ÇAÇAN Erdal1ORCID,KÖKTEN Kağan2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. BİNGÖL ÜNİVERSİTESİ

2. SİVAS BİLİM VE TEKNOLOJİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Abstract

This study was carried out in the year 2015-16 and 2016-17 growing season in order to determine and compare the yield, digestibility dry matter and relative feed value of straw obtained from cereals. In the study, which was carried out in three replications according to the randomized blocks experimental design; 3 bread wheat, 3 durum wheat, 3 triticale and 4 barley cultivars were used as plant material. The difference between cereal species in terms of plant height, biological yield, seed yield, straw yield and crude protein was statistically significant (P≤0.01). In terms of these features the highest results were obtained from triticale straw and the lowest values were obtained from barley and bread wheat straw. At the same time, the lowest crude protein ratio was obtained from triticale straw, where the best yield results were obtained. The difference between cereal species in terms of crude protein yield, ADF and NDF contens, digestibility dry matter and relative feed values were found to be statistically insignificant. As a result, it was determined that the species with the highest yield among the species was trikale. In terms of quality criteria, it was determined that only the crude protein content was statistically significant among the species and the lowest value was obtained from triticale and the highest value was obtained from bread wheat and barley in terms of this property.

Publisher

Harran Tarim ve Gida Dergisi

Reference33 articles.

1. Abdi, A.M., & Kilic, U. (2018). Effect of lignin peroxidase enzyme on feed values of different straws. KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature, 21(3), 374-384.

2. Acar, Z., Tan, M., Ayan, İ., Önal Aşçı, Ö., Mut, H., Başaran, U., Gülümser, E., Can, M., & Kaymak, G. (2020). The situation of forage crops agriculture and Its development opportunities in Turkey. Agricultural Engineers of Turkey IX. Technical Congress. 13-17 January Ankara, 529-553.

3. Akdeniz, H., Keskin, B., Yilmaz, I., & Oral, E. (2004). A research on yield and yield components of some barley cultivars. Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 14(2), 119-125.

4. Altin, M., Orak, A., & Tuna, C. (2009). Importance of forage crops in terms of sustainable agriculture. (In Turkish) In R. Avcioglu, R. Hatiopglu & Y. Karadag (Eds.), Forage Crops Vol I (pp. 11-28). Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, Publications of the General Directorate of Agriculture and Publication, Izmir.

5. Ball, D.M., Hoveland, C.S., & Lacefield, G.D. (1996). Forage Quality in Southern Forages (pp. 124-132). Publ. By the Williams Printing Company.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3