The Feminist Approach in the Decision-making Process for Treatment of Women With Breast Cancer

Author:

Szumacher Ewa1

Affiliation:

1. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

Introduction: The principal aim of this review was to investigate a feminist approach to the decision-making process for women with breast cancer. Empirical research into patient preferences for being informed about and participating in healthcare decisions has some limitations because it is mostly quantitative and designed within the dominant medical culture. Indigenous medical knowledge and alternative medical treatments are not widely accepted because of the lack of confirmed efficacy of such treatments in evidence-based literature. While discussing their treatment options with oncologists, women with breast cancer frequently express many concerns regarding treatment side effects, and sometimes decline conventional treatment when the risks are too high. Methods: A search of all relevant literary sources, including Pub-Med, ERIC, Medline, and the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education at the University of Toronto was conducted. The key words for selection of the articles were “feminism,” “decision-making,” “patients preferences for treatment,” and “breast cancer.” Results: Fifty-one literary sources were selected. The review was divided into the following themes: (1) limitations of the patient decision-making process in conventional medicine; (2) participation of native North American patients in healthcare decisions; (3) towards a feminist approach to breast cancer; and (4) towards a feminist theory of breast cancer. Conclusion: This article discusses the importance of a feminist approach to the decision-making process for treatment of patients with breast cancer. As the literature suggests, the needs of minority patients are not completely fulfilled in Western medical culture. Introducing feminist theory into evidence-based medicine will help patients to be better informed about treatment choices and will assist them to select treatment according to their own beliefs and values. Key words: Evidence-based, Gender, Minority, Preferences

Publisher

Academy of Medicine, Singapore

Subject

General Medicine

Reference51 articles.

1. Coward HG, Ratanakul P, editors. A Cross-Cultural Dialogue on HealthCare Ethics. Victoria, BC: University of Victoria Centre for Studies in Religion and Society, 1999:xii.

2. Keyserlingk EW. Ethics codes and guidelines for health care andresearch: can respect for autonomy be a multicultural principle? In: Winkler ER, Coombs JR, editors. Applied Ethics: A Reader. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1993:390-415.

3. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 2nd ed.New York: Oxford Press, 1983:xviii.

4. Callahan D. Autonomy: a moral good, not a moral obsession. HastingsCent Rep 1984;14:40-2.

5. Degner LF, Sloan JA. Decision making during serious illness: what roledo patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol 1992;45:941-50.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Curriculum TIPS For All of Us;Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore;2006-09-15

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3