Mental Health Professionals’ Perceived Barriers and Benefits, and Personal Concerns in Relation to Psychiatric Research

Author:

Pek Elaine1,Subramaniam Mythily2,Vaingankar Janhavi1,Chan Yiong Huak3,Mahendran Rathi1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Mental Health, Singapore

2. Singapore Health Services, Singapore

3. National University of Singapore, Singapore

Abstract

Aim: Mental health professionals can contribute to generating a strong evidence base for policy and practice in psychiatry. An insight into their perception of psychiatric research is important for planning support strategies. This study explored healthcare professionals’ perceptions of barriers, benefits and concerns about psychiatric research in a Singapore psychiatric hospital. Materials and Methods: Self-administered questionnaire was employed to collect socio-demographic data and opinions on research. Likert scale was used for the responses and descriptive statistics and ordinal regression were used for data analysing. Results: 93.8% respondents perceived “contribution to medical knowledge/ public health” to be a major benefit of conducting research. 86.7% respondents felt that “learning experience” was important. “Prestige/publication” (52.7%) and “financial gain” (76%) were perceived to be unimportant. “Clinical load of patients”, “lack of skilled personnel to assist in research” and “insufficient funding” were identified as important barriers by 72.4%, 70.6% and 68.9% respondents. “Time constraints”, “patient and family readiness to research participation”, “insufficient training” and “concerns about patient welfare” are major concerns while conducting research. Conclusion: To the study team’s best knowledge, this is the only study of mental health professionals’ perceptions on psychiatric research. It is useful for strategising research planning and enhancing the research culture in the hospital. Key words: Healthcare professionals, Mental health research, Research planning strategies

Publisher

Academy of Medicine, Singapore

Subject

General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Saxena S, Sharan P, Saraceno B. Budget and financing of mental healthservices: baseline information on 89 countries from WHO’s project ATLAS. J Ment Health Policy Econ 2003;6:135-43.

2. Hu TW. Financing global mental health services and the role of WHO.J Ment Health Policy Econ 2003;6:145-7.

3. Ustun TB. The global burden of mental disorders. Am J Public Health1999;89:1315-8.

4. World Health Organization. The global burden of disease. Cambridge,Mass: Harvard University Press, 1997.

5. Michels R. Are research ethics bad for our mental health. N Engl J Med1999;340:1427-30.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3