Are Pregnant Women Adequately Equipped for Autonomy in Pregnancy Screening?

Author:

Thain Serene PT1,Choi Christina TH1,Yeo George SH1

Affiliation:

1. KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore

Abstract

Introduction: Aneuploidy screening is widely practised in the field of obstetrics in current times. This study thus aims to gain an insight on pregnant women’s knowledge and risk perception of Down syndrome and first trimester screening (FTS), as well as their views on various potential pregnancy outcomes and how these may affect their decision-making processes. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based qualitative study of consecutive 50 women choosing to undergo FTS at KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital (KKH), Singapore was conducted. The women completed a questionnaire after their FTS pretest counselling session. Basic knowledge of Down syndrome and FTS as well as participants’ risk perception with regards to various cut-off values used in FTS were examined. Patients’ views of various potential pregnancy outcomes were also studied. Results: Most patients had good retention and comprehension of what FTS entailed after a FTS counselling session at the KKH Antenatal Monitoring Clinic. However, knowledge of the risks of invasive diagnostic testing was poor. Patients also did not possess an adequate understanding of FTS risk values. With regards to risk perception, patients had very different views on acceptable pregnancy outcomes and what constituted a high-risk FTS value to them personally. A significant number of women were concerned even at medically low-risk values of 1:500 and 1:1000 in FTS. The majority of patients viewed highest detection rate followed by a lowest false positive rate as the more important factors impacting their choice of a Down syndrome screening test. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the diversity of pregnant women’s risk perception, risk aversion and participation in decision processes when there are 2 different values in competition. The study also highlights our patients’ gaps in knowledge and lack of understanding of risk values used in FTS. Key words: Choice, Decision-making, Pregnancy, Prenatal test, Risk assessment

Publisher

Academy of Medicine, Singapore

Subject

General Medicine

Reference13 articles.

1. Orlandi F, Damiani G, Hallaban TW, Krantz DA and Macri JN. First trimester screening for fetal aneuploidy: biochemistry and nuchal translucency. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997;10:381-386.

2. Nicolaides KH. The 11–13+6 weeks scan [Internet]. London: Fetal Medicine Foundation; 2004. Available at: http://www.fetalmedicine.com/synced/fmf/FMF-English.pdf. Accessed 24 December 2012.

3. College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Singapore. Recommended ‘Best Practice’ Guidelines on antenatal screening for trisomy 21 (Down Syndrome) and other fetal aneuploidies. COGS Consensus Statements, 2008. Available at: http://ams.edu.sg/view-pdf.aspx?file=media\754_fi_329.pdf&ofile=Consensus_Statement_Downs_Syndrome.pdf. Accessed 24 December 2012.

4. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (UK). Antenatal care: routine care for the healthy pregnant woman [Internet]. London: RCOG Press; 2008. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg62/resources/cg62-antenatal-care-full-guideline-corrected-june-20082. Accessed 24 December 2012.

5. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 77: screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:21727.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3