Usability and Acceptability of Clinical Dashboards in Aged Care: Systematic Review

Author:

Siette JoyceORCID,Dodds LauraORCID,Sharifi FaribaORCID,Nguyen AmyORCID,Baysari MelissaORCID,Seaman KarlaORCID,Raban MagdalenaORCID,Wabe NasirORCID,Westbrook JohannaORCID

Abstract

Background The use of clinical dashboards in aged care systems to support performance review and improve outcomes for older adults receiving care is increasing. Objective Our aim was to explore evidence from studies of the acceptability and usability of clinical dashboards including their visual features and functionalities in aged care settings. Methods A systematic review was conducted using 5 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL) from inception to April 2022. Studies were included in the review if they were conducted in aged care environments (home-based community care, retirement villages, and long-term care) and reported a usability or acceptability evaluation of a clinical dashboard for use in aged care environments, including specific dashboard visual features (eg, a qualitative summary of individual user experience or metrics from a usability scale). Two researchers independently reviewed the articles and extracted the data. Data synthesis was performed via narrative review, and the risk of bias was measured using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Results In total, 14 articles reporting on 12 dashboards were included. The quality of the articles varied. There was considerable heterogeneity in implementation setting (home care 8/14, 57%), dashboard user groups (health professionals 9/14, 64%), and sample size (range 3-292). Dashboard features included a visual representation of information (eg, medical condition prevalence), analytic capability (eg, predictive), and others (eg, stakeholder communication). Dashboard usability was mixed (4 dashboards rated as high), and dashboard acceptability was high for 9 dashboards. Most users considered dashboards to be informative, relevant, and functional, highlighting the use and intention of using this resource in the future. Dashboards that had the presence of one or more of these features (bar charts, radio buttons, checkboxes or other symbols, interactive displays, and reporting capabilities) were found to be highly acceptable. Conclusions A comprehensive summary of clinical dashboards used in aged care is provided to inform future dashboard development, testing, and implementation. Further research is required to optimize visualization features, usability, and acceptability of dashboards in aged care.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Health Informatics,Gerontology,Health (social science)

Reference62 articles.

1. XieCXMaherCMachadoGCDigital health dashboards for improving health systems, healthcare delivery and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocolOSF20202023-05-16https://osf.io/8me96/

2. The impact on health outcomes of implementing electronic health records to support the care of older people in residential aged care: A scoping review

3. Improving the Efficiency and Ease of Healthcare Analysis Through Use of Data Visualization Dashboards

4. PeymanTMoritzLDesigning user-adaptive information dashboards: considering limited attention and working memory201927th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS)June 2019Stockholm & Uppsala, Sweden

5. Emerging ICT implementation issues in aged care

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3