Abstract
Background
Co-design (or the participation of users) has shown great potential in the eHealth domain, demonstrating positive results. Nevertheless, the co-design approach cannot guarantee the usability of the system designed, and usability assessment is a complex analysis to perform, as evaluation criteria will differ depending on the usability framework (or set of criteria) used. ISO (International Organization for Standardization) on usability (ISO 9241-210), Nielsen heuristic, and Garrett element of user experience inform different yet complementary aspects of usability.
Objective
This study aims to assess the usability and user experience of a co-design prototype by combining 3 complementary frameworks.
Methods
To help caregivers provide care for functionally impaired older people, an eHealth tool was co-designed with caregivers, health and social service professionals, and community workers assisting caregivers. The prototype was a website that aims to support the help-seeking process for caregivers (finding resources) and allow service providers to advertise their services (offering resources). We chose an exploratory study method to assess usability in terms of each objective. The first step was to assess users’ first impressions of the website. The second was a task scenario with a think-aloud protocol. The final step was a semistructured interview. All steps were performed individually (with a moderator) in a single session. The data were analyzed using 3 frameworks.
Results
A total of 10 participants were recruited, 5 for each objective of the website. We were able to identify several usability problems, most of which were located in the information design and interface design dimensions (Garrett framework). Problems in both dimensions were mainly coded as effectiveness and efficiency (ISO framework) and error prevention and match between the systemand the real world (Nielsen heuristic).
Conclusions
Our study provided a novel contribution about usability analysis by combining the 3 different models to classify the problems found. This combination provided a holistic understanding of the usability improvements needed. It can also be used to analyze other eHealth products.
International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)
RR2-10.2196/11634
Subject
Health Informatics,Human Factors and Ergonomics
Reference45 articles.
1. Digital Health MythsCanada Health Infoway2021-06-01https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/myths
2. Effectiveness of an Internet Intervention for Family Caregivers of People with Dementia: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
3. Components and Outcomes of Internet-Based Interventions for Caregivers of Older Adults: Systematic Review
4. Systematic Review of Technology-Based Interventions Targeting Chronically Ill Adults and Their Caregivers
5. L’appui pour les proches aidants d’aînés. Portrait statistique des proches aidants de personnes de 65 ans et plus au QuébecL'Appui20162021-07-14https://www.lappui.org/Organisations/Boite-a-outils/Portrait-statistique-des-proches-aidants-d-aines-au-Quebec
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献