Usability of a Co-designed eHealth Prototype for Caregivers: Combination Study of Three Frameworks

Author:

Tremblay MelanieORCID,Latulippe KarineORCID,Guay ManonORCID,Provencher VéroniqueORCID,Giguère AnickORCID,Poulin ValérieORCID,Dubé VéroniqueORCID,Giroux DominiqueORCID

Abstract

Background Co-design (or the participation of users) has shown great potential in the eHealth domain, demonstrating positive results. Nevertheless, the co-design approach cannot guarantee the usability of the system designed, and usability assessment is a complex analysis to perform, as evaluation criteria will differ depending on the usability framework (or set of criteria) used. ISO (International Organization for Standardization) on usability (ISO 9241-210), Nielsen heuristic, and Garrett element of user experience inform different yet complementary aspects of usability. Objective This study aims to assess the usability and user experience of a co-design prototype by combining 3 complementary frameworks. Methods To help caregivers provide care for functionally impaired older people, an eHealth tool was co-designed with caregivers, health and social service professionals, and community workers assisting caregivers. The prototype was a website that aims to support the help-seeking process for caregivers (finding resources) and allow service providers to advertise their services (offering resources). We chose an exploratory study method to assess usability in terms of each objective. The first step was to assess users’ first impressions of the website. The second was a task scenario with a think-aloud protocol. The final step was a semistructured interview. All steps were performed individually (with a moderator) in a single session. The data were analyzed using 3 frameworks. Results A total of 10 participants were recruited, 5 for each objective of the website. We were able to identify several usability problems, most of which were located in the information design and interface design dimensions (Garrett framework). Problems in both dimensions were mainly coded as effectiveness and efficiency (ISO framework) and error prevention and match between the systemand the real world (Nielsen heuristic). Conclusions Our study provided a novel contribution about usability analysis by combining the 3 different models to classify the problems found. This combination provided a holistic understanding of the usability improvements needed. It can also be used to analyze other eHealth products. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/11634

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Subject

Health Informatics,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Reference45 articles.

1. Digital Health MythsCanada Health Infoway2021-06-01https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/myths

2. Effectiveness of an Internet Intervention for Family Caregivers of People with Dementia: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

3. Components and Outcomes of Internet-Based Interventions for Caregivers of Older Adults: Systematic Review

4. Systematic Review of Technology-Based Interventions Targeting Chronically Ill Adults and Their Caregivers

5. L’appui pour les proches aidants d’aînés. Portrait statistique des proches aidants de personnes de 65 ans et plus au QuébecL'Appui20162021-07-14https://www.lappui.org/Organisations/Boite-a-outils/Portrait-statistique-des-proches-aidants-d-aines-au-Quebec

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3