Evaluating user engagement with a real-time, text-based digital mental health support application: a cross-sectional, retrospective study (Preprint)

Author:

Coffield EdwardORCID,Kausar KhadejaORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Approximately 20% of U.S. adults identify as having a mental illness. Structural and other barriers prevent many people from receiving mental health services. Digital mental health applications may improve access to mental health services. However, how and why people engage with licensed counselors through a digital, real-time, text-based mental health support application in non-experimental settings is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate how people engage with Counslr, a 24 hour, digital, text-based mental health support application where users interact with licensed counselors in real-time on their mobile devices.

METHODS

The study population (users) consisted of students whose schools/universities/colleges partnered with Counslr and employees whose organizations also partnered with Counslr. Users participated in text-based mental health support sessions. In these sessions, users engaged with licensed counselors through digital, text-based mental health support sessions. Users could initiate an on-demand session or schedule a session 24 hours a day. User engagement patterns were evaluated through session length, session day, session time, and self-reported reason(s) for initiating the session. The data was stratified by user type (students or employees) and session type (on-demand or scheduled) to evaluate whether differences existed in usage patterns and self-reported reasons for initiating sessions by user and session types.

RESULTS

Most students (62.9%) and employees (63.6%) accessed Counslr through on-demand sessions. The average and median session times were 40.0 (σ=15.3) and 45.0 minutes. On-demand sessions (37.9 minutes) were shorter (ρ=.001) than scheduled sessions (43.5 minutes). Most users (80.1%) accessed Counslr between 7pm and 5am. The hour users accessed Counslr did not statistically differ by user or session type. Primary self-reported reasons for accessing Counslr were relationship reasons, depression, and anxiety; however, users initiated sessions for a variety of reasons. Statistically significant differences existed between user types and session types in terms of why people initiated a session.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel findings of this study illustrate that real-time, digital mental health support applications, that offer people the opportunity to engage with licensed counselors outside of standard office hours for a variety of mental health conditions, may help address structural barriers to accessing mental health support services.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3