User perceptions of different monitor modalities during high-fidelity simulation: Visual-Patient-avatar, Split Screen and Conventional - a semiquantitative analysis (Preprint)

Author:

Akbas SamiraORCID,Said SadiqORCID,Roche Tadzio RaoulORCID,Nöthiger Christoph BeatORCID,Spahn Donat RudolfORCID,Tscholl David WernerORCID,Bergauer LisaORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient safety during anesthesia is crucially dependent on the monitoring of vital signs. However, the values obtained must also be perceived and correctly classified by the attending care providers. To facilitate these processes, we developed Visual-Patient-avatar- an animated virtual model of the monitored patient, which innovatively presents numerical and waveform data following user-centered design principles.

OBJECTIVE

After a high-fidelity simulation study, we analyzed participants' perceptions of three different monitor modalities, including this new technique.

METHODS

This study was a researcher-initiated, single-center, semiquantitative study. We asked 92 care providers right after finishing three simulated emergency scenarios about their positive and negative opinions concerning the different monitor modalities. We processed the field notes obtained and derived main categories and corresponding subthemes following qualitative research methods.

RESULTS

We gained a total of 307 statements. Through a context-based analysis, we identified the three main categories “Visual-Patient-avatar”, “Split Screen” as well as “Conventional monitor” and divided them into eleven positive and negative subthemes. We achieved substantial inter-rater reliability in assigning the statements to one of the topics. Most of the statements concerned the design and usability features of the avatar or the Split Screen mode.

CONCLUSIONS

This study semiquantitatively reviewed the clinical applicability of the Visual-Patient-avatar technique in a high-fidelity simulation study and revealed strengths and limitations of the avatar only und Split Screen modality. In addition to valuable suggestions for improving the design, the requirement for training prior to clinical implementation was emphasized. Responses to the Split Screen suggest that this symbiotic modality generates better situation awareness in combination with numerical data and accurate curves. As a subsequent development step, a real-life introduction study is planned, where we will test the avatar in Split Screen mode under actual clinical conditions.

CLINICALTRIAL

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3