Implementation of an online consultation tool and reported patient experience of primary care: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2022 General Practice Patient Survey in England (Preprint)

Author:

Ge XiaochenORCID,Chappell PaulORCID,Ledger JeanORCID,Bakhai MinalORCID,Clarke Geraldine M.ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient experience is a key outcome of health and care, a key component of quality of care and an important policy focus for the NHS. Patient experience of general practice can be influenced by using online consultation tools for access and triage. Patient experience is known to vary in relation to socio-demographic factors.

OBJECTIVE

Given the rapid scale up and diversity of online consultation tools in English general practice, we investigated the association between implementation of an online consultation tools and patient experience, and how that varied by the online consultation tool design and implementation model and practice socio-demographic factors.

METHODS

We categorised practices according to their usage of one of two online consultation tools which differed in their design and implementation model: ‘free-text’ (FT) with an embedded single workflow with supporting total triage; or ‘mixed-text’ (MT) with mixed input of free-text and logic based multiple choice without an embedded workflow supporting total triage. We considered survey responses from the General Practice Patient Survey in England in relation to domains of overall experience, experience of making an appointment, continuity of care and use of self-care before making an appointment. We used logistic regression models at practice level to explore association between usage of the online consultation tool and patient experience.

RESULTS

We included 287,194 responses from 2,423 MT and 170 FT practices. At MT practices increased usage was associated with reductions of more than 19% (P<.001) in experience across all dimensions other than self-care but an increase of 28% (P<.001) in self-care. Conversely, at FT practices increased usage was associated with improvements of more than 23% (P<.001) in experience across all dimensions other than self-care, but no effect on self-care. The association between usage and patient experience varied by practice socio-demographic characteristics. For example, greater improvements in overall patient experience with increased usage at FT practices in urban areas, and with the greatest proportions of younger and non-White ethnicity patients masked declines at the opposite cohorts of FT practices (in rural areas and with the smallest proportions of younger and non-White ethnicity patients). In general, inequalities in patient experience tended to narrow with increased usage reflecting greater improvements for groups that traditionally experience most challenges.

CONCLUSIONS

Online consultation tools offering free-text input and embedded using a single workflow with total triage can lead to improved patient experience of general practice and reduced socio-demographic disparities in access to care. However, stark differences in reported patient experience at practices using different online consultation tools suggest that careful consideration as to how online consultation tools are designed and implemented is required to achieve this. Generalising impacts across different online consultation tools is likely to be difficult or impossible.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3