A Methodology-Oriented Assessment of Digital Phenotyping for Mood Disorders (Preprint)

Author:

Breitinger ScottORCID,Gardea-Resendez Manuel,Laivell Joseph,Stoppel Cynthia,Harper Laura,Volety Rama,Walker Alex,D'Mello Ryan,Byun Jin Soo,Zandi Peter,Goes Fernando,Frye Mark,Torous JohnORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the burgeoning area of clinical digital phenotyping research, there is a dearth of literature that details methodology, including the key challenges and dilemmas in developing and implementing a successful architecture for technological infrastructure, patient engagement, longitudinal study participation, and successful reporting and analysis of diverse passive and active digital data streams.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides a narrative rationale for our study design in the context of current evidence base and best practices with an emphasis on our initial lessons learned from the implementation challenges and successes of this study.

METHODS

We describe the specific study methodology we implemented for this study with an attention to synthesizing key literature and the reasoning for pragmatic adaptations in implemenating in a multi-site study encompassing distinct geographic and population settings.

RESULTS

We describe the feasibility of a multi-site digital phenotyping pilot study for patients with mood disorders, focused on the informatics framework for our study, practical learnings about study subject use of our hardware and software tools, and perceived strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and barriers to success in implementing digital phenotyping research for mood disorders and other psychiatric conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

We leverage our experience with developing a pilot feasibility study to help academic and industry researchers and developers efficiently and effectively conceptualize and operationalize further digital phenotyping investigations in this promising area of mental health research. We believe the methodology described will be readily reproducible and generalizable to other study settings and patient populations.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3