Exploring the impact of medical knowledge and information search skills on information searching behavior and quality of information found: A study comparing students-residents in medicine versus students in computer science (Preprint)

Author:

Chevalier AlineORCID,Tamine LyndaORCID,Dosso CheyenneORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nowadays, Internet has become the primary source of information for physicians seeking answers to medical questions about their patients before consulting colleagues. However, many websites display information of low quality, less reliability, and lack scientific verification. Therefore, physicians need to develop information search skills to locate relevant and evidence-based information. However, previous studies have shown that physicians often have poor search skills and encounter difficulties in finding information on the Web. These challenges may have detrimental consequences on patient care.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aims to determine how medical students-residents search for medical information on Internet, what quality of web resources they utilize (including the nature and credibility of resources), and how they evaluate the reliability of web resources and the answers they provide. Given the importance of domain knowledge (in this case, medicine) and information search skills to the search activity, we compared the search behaviors of medical students and residents to those of students in computer science. Medical students-residents typically possess higher medical-related knowledge, while students in computer science generally have information search skills.

METHODS

Twenty students participated in this study: ten medical students-residents and ten students in computer science. Data were extracted from a freely accessible dataset. All participants were tasked with searching for information on the web to make a medical diagnosis, select a treatment, and enhance their knowledge of a medical condition—three primary activities they engage in online. We analyzed search performance metrics (such as search time, medical-related keywords used, and accuracy of information found) as well as the nature and credibility of web resources utilized by medical students and residents compared to students in computer science.

RESULTS

Students-residents in medicine provided, in mean, more accurate answers than students in computer science, all without requiring additional time. Their background in medicine also enabled them to better evaluate the reliability of resources and select high-quality web resources more effectively than students in computer science, primarily from hospital websites. However, it is noteworthy that students-residents in medicine utilized very few evidence-based tools, such as PubMed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although that students-residents in medicine had in general high performance than students in computer science, they did not use frequently evidence-based tools. As previously observed students-residents may avoid using databases due to the risk of encountering too many irrelevant articles and difficulties in applying correct filters to locate relevant information. Nevertheless, clinical and practical evidence-based medicine can significantly contribute to updating physicians' knowledge, improving patient care, and enhancing physician-patient relationships. Therefore, information search should be an integral part of medical training programs and continuing medical education for physicians.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3