Development and Testing of a Tool to Foster Shared Decision-Making between Patients and Healthcare Professionals in Clinical Practice Guidelines: Project Protocol (Preprint)

Author:

Fischer LenaORCID,Scheibler FülöpORCID,Schaefer Corinna,Karge TorstenORCID,Langer ThomasORCID,Schewe Leon VincentORCID,Florez Ivan D.ORCID,Li SheyuORCID,Maes-Carballo MartaORCID,Munn ZacharyORCID,Perestelo-Perez LilisbethORCID,Puljak LiviaORCID,Stiggelbout AnneORCID,Pieper DawidORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are designed to assist healthcare professionals in medical decision-making. In the context of preference-sensitive CPG recommendations, shared decision-making (SDM) is advocated as a way of incorporating patients’ values and preferences into the decision-making process. However, existing evidence suggests that CPGs are currently not well suited to facilitate SDM effectively. To address this shortcoming and foster SDM through CPGs, the integration of patient decision aids (PDAs) has been proposed as an important strategy. However, there are currently no methods available for systematically identifying and prioritizing CPG recommendations according to their relevance for SDM.

OBJECTIVE

To develop (1) a tool for CPG developers to systematically identify and prioritize CPG recommendations with high relevance for SDM, and (2) a platform for PDAs.

METHODS

The project consists of six work packages (WPs). In WP 1, we will conduct a scoping review in bibliographic databases and grey literature sources to identify methods used to foster SDM via PDAs in the context of CPGs. In WP 2, we will conduct semi-structured interviews with CPG experts to better understand the concepts of preference sensitivity and identify strategies for fostering SDM through CPGs. In WP 3, a modified Delphi study, including surveys and focus groups with SDM experts, aims to define and operationalize preference sensitivity. Based on the results of the Delphi study, we will develop a methodology for prioritizing key questions in CPGs. In WP 4, the tool will be developed. A list of relevant items to identify CPG recommendations that are most relevant to SDM is created, tested and iteratively refined, accompanied by the development of a user manual. In WP 5, a platform for creating and digitizing German language PDAs will be developed to support the practical application of SDM during clinical encounters. WP 6 will conclude the project by testing the tool with newly developed and revised CPGs.

RESULTS

The Brandenburg Medical School Ethics Committee approved the qualitative parts of the project (i.e. WP 2 and 3; No. 165122023-ANF). An international multidisciplinary advisory board is involved to guide the tool development on CPGs and SDM. Patient partners are involved throughout the project, considering the essential role of the patient perspective in SDM. As of 20 February 2024, we are currently assessing literature references to determine eligibility for inclusion in the scoping review (WP 1). We expect the project to be completed by 31 December 2026.

CONCLUSIONS

The tool will enable CPG developers to systematically incorporate aspects of SDM into CPG development, thereby providing guideline–based support for the patient-practitioner interaction. Together, the tool and the PDA platform will create a systematic link between CPGs, SDM and PDAs, which may facilitate SDM in clinical practice.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3