“I haven’t been diagnosed, but I should be”: Insight into self-diagnoses of common mental health disorders (Preprint)

Author:

Rutter Lauren AlexandraORCID,Howard JacquelineORCID,Lakhan Prabhvir,Valdez DannyORCID,Bollen JohanORCID,Lorenzo-Luaces LorenzoORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent years, social media has become a rich source of mental health data. However, there is a lack of research on the accuracy and validity of self-reported diagnostic information online.

OBJECTIVE

An analysis of the degree of correspondence between self-reported diagnoses and clinical indicators will afford researchers and clinicians higher levels of trust in social media analysis. We hypothesized that self-reported diagnoses would correspond to validated disorder-specific severity questionnaires across two large online samples.

METHODS

Study 1 participants were 1123 adults from a national Qualtrics panel (mean age= 34.65, SD= 12.56; 56.65% female). Study 2 participants were 2237 college students from a large university in the Midwest (mean age= 19.75, SD= 2.75; 75.25% female). All participants completed an online survey about their mental health, social media use, and demographic information. Additionally, participants reported on whether they had ever been diagnosed with a series of disorders, with the option of selecting “Yes”; “No, but I should be”; “I don’t know,” and “No” for each condition. We conducted a series of analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests to determine whether there were differences between each of the four diagnostic groups and used post-hoc Tukey tests to examine the nature of the differences.

RESULTS

In Study 1, for self-reported mania (F(3, 1097)=2.75,P=.04) somatic symptom disorder (F(3, 1060)=26.75,P< .001) and alcohol use disorder F(3, 1097)=77.73,P< .001), the pattern of mean differences did not suggest that individuals are accurate in their insight to diagnoses. In Study 2, for all disorders but bipolar disorder (F(3, 659)=1.43,P= .23), ANOVA results were consistent with our expectations. Across both studies and for most conditions assessed, individuals who say they have been diagnosed with a disorder had the highest severity scores on self-report questionnaires, but that is closely followed by individuals who have not been diagnosed but believe they should be diagnosed. This was especially true for depression, generalized anxiety, and insomnia. For mania and bipolar disorder, questionnaire scores did not differentiate individuals who had been diagnosed from those who had not.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, if an individual believes they should be diagnosed with a disorder, they are experiencing a degree of psychopathology similar to those who have already been diagnosed. Self-reported diagnoses correspond well with symptom severity on a continuum and can be trusted as clinical indicators, especially in common internalizing disorders like depression and generalized anxiety disorder. Researchers can put more faith into patient self-report, including those that occur in online experiments such as social media posts, when individuals report diagnoses of depression and anxiety disorders. Replication and further study is recommended.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3