Comparison of Smart Display Versus Laptop Platforms for an eHealth Intervention to Improve Functional Health for Older Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial (Preprint)

Author:

Gustafson Sr David H.ORCID,Mares Marie-LouiseORCID,Johnston Darcie C.ORCID,Vjorn Olivia J.ORCID,Curtin John J.ORCID,Pe-Romashko KlarenORCID,Landucci GinaORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Maintaining functional health, or the ability to live independently, is a primary goal of individuals as they age, but most older adults develop chronic conditions that threaten this goal. Physical activity is a key aspect of self-care that can improve functional health, and digital interventions offering guidance in appropriate exercise can help. However, older adults with multiple morbidities may be unable to use laptop or smartphone-based eHealth because poor vision, dexterity, mobility, or other physical challenges make typing or touch navigation difficult. A smart display platform—comprising a smart speaker plus a small visual screen—has the potential to remove these barriers because it is voice activated.

OBJECTIVE

Compare usage patterns of an eHealth intervention for older adults when delivered via a voice-based smart display versus a typing-based laptop, and assess whether the smart display outperforms the laptop in improving functional health and its specific physical and mental aspects.

METHODS

A minimum of 356 adults age 60 and older with at least 5 chronic health conditions are to be recruited from primary care clinics and community organizations. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to 12 months of access to an evidence-based intervention, ElderTree, delivered on either a smart display or a touchscreen laptop, with a post-intervention follow-up at 18 months. The primary outcome is differences between groups on a comprehensive measure of physical and mental functional health. Secondary outcomes are between-group differences in separate aspects of functional health (eg, physical function, depression), as well as health distress, loneliness, unscheduled healthcare, and falls. We will also examine mediators and moderators of effects of ElderTree on both platforms. Participants will complete surveys at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months, and ElderTree use data will be collected continuously during the intervention period in system logs. We will use linear mixed effect models to evaluate outcomes over time, with treatment condition and timepoint as between-subjects factors. Separate analyses will be conducted for each outcome.

RESULTS

Recruitment began in July 2023 and was completed in May 2024, with 387 participants enrolled. The 12-month intervention period will end May 2025; data collection will end November 2025. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications.

CONCLUSIONS

Voice-activated digital health interventions have theoretical but untested advantages over typing-based technologies for older adults with physical limitations. As the population ages, and as multiple morbidities threaten the functional health of the majority of older adults, innovations in self-management are a matter of public health as well as individual quality of life.

CLINICALTRIAL

clinicaltrials.gov NCT05240534

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3