The Effect of Objectively Collected Medication Adherence Information on Bipolar I and Major Depressive Disorder Treatment Decisions: A Randomized Case Vignette Study of Psychiatric Clinicians (Preprint)

Author:

Ruetsch Charles,Liberman Joshua,Clerie Jennifer,Davis Tigwa,Sajatovic Martha,Velligan Dawn I.,Forma Felicia M.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adherence to antipsychotic medications is critical for treatment and relapse prevention in serious mental illness. Accurate assessment of medication adherence can be difficult, and clinicians frequently overestimate patient adherence. Newly available digital medicine technologies can objectively assess patient medication adherence and share the data with clinicians.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the influence of objectively collected antipsychotic medication adherence information on clinician treatment decisions among patients with bipolar (BD) and major depressive (MDD) disorders.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional two-group random assignment survey of psychiatric clinicians who prescribe antipsychotic medication in the treatment of BD and/or MDD. Clinicians (N=180) were recruited using national association lists. Respondents were presented with five simulated patient case summaries (vignettes) each presenting descriptions of symptoms, level of functioning, and self-reported medication adherence. Clinicians were presented with either BD or MDD vignettes and were randomly assigned to vignettes that presented subjective (self-report) or objective adherence information. For each vignette, respondents were asked to recommend adjustments in medication.

RESULTS

A total of 180 clinicians participated. Those who were asked to make decision on care of BD (N=90) were more likely to modify antipsychotic treatment as opposed to mood stabilizers. Clinicians who were asked to make care decision of MDD patients (N=90) were more likely to modify antidepressant treatment as opposed to antipsychotic prescriptions. Among vignettes indicating non-adherence, reports derived from objective adherence data increased recommendations to adopt long-acting injectable antipsychotics though the rate of LAI choice overall was greater for BD vs. MDD.

CONCLUSIONS

Objective adherence data helps clinicians distinguish between medication non-adherence and medication non-response, thus allowing them to make more informed treatment decisions. These data suggest that the presence of objective adherence data will influence clinicians’ prescribing patterns as illustrated by their recommendations to modify antipsychotic medication prescriptions for patients with BD and to a lesser degree those with MDD.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3