Workarounds in Electronic Health Record Systems: A Scoping Review and Revised SEWA Framework (Preprint)

Author:

Blijleven VincentORCID,Hoxha Florian,Jaspers MoniqueORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic health record system (EHR) users devise workarounds to cope with mismatches between workflows designed in the EHR and preferred workflows in practice. Although workarounds appear beneficial at first sight, they frequently jeopardize patient safety, quality of care, and efficiency of care.

OBJECTIVE

To aid in identifying, analyzing, and resolving EHR workarounds, a sociotechnical EHR workaround analysis framework (SEWA) was published in 2019. Although the framework was based on a large case study, the framework still required theoretical validation, refinement, and enrichment.

METHODS

A scoping literature review was performed on studies related to EHR workarounds published between 2010-2021 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane or IEEE databases. 737 studies were retrieved, of which 62 were included in the final analysis. Using an analytic frame, the included studies were investigated to uncover rationales EHR users have for workarounds, attributes characterizing workarounds, possible scopes, and types of perceived impact of workarounds.

RESULTS

The SEWA framework was theoretically validated and extended based on the scoping review. Extensive support for the preexisting rationales, attributes, possible scopes, and types of impact was found in the included studies. Moreover, 7 new rationales, 4 new attributes, and 3 new types of impact were incorporated. Similarly, the descriptions of multiple preexisting rationales for workarounds were refined to describe each rationale more accurately.

CONCLUSIONS

SEWA is now grounded in the existing body of peer-reviewed empirical evidence on EHR workarounds and as such provides a theoretically validated and more complete synthesis on EHR workaround rationales, attributes, possible scopes, and types of impact. The revised SEWA framework can aid researchers and practitioners in a wider range of healthcare settings to identify, analyze, and resolve workarounds. This to improve user centered EHR (re)design, ultimately leading to improved patient safety, quality of care, and efficiency of care.

CLINICALTRIAL

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3