A systematic review of the effectiveness of conventional versus technology assisted cue exposure therapy for treating substance use disorders (Preprint)

Author:

Thaysen-Petersen DanielORCID,Hammerum Sigurd Krogh,Düring Signe Wegmann,Fink-Jensen Anders,Mellentin Angelina I.ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cue Exposure Therapy (CET) is a behavioristic psychological intervention for treating substance use disorders (SUDs. Recently, CET has been examined in technology-assisted formats to increase intervention effectiveness. No systematic review has examined the effectiveness of different CET formats across types of SUDs.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to examine the effectiveness of CET across SUD types and examine the effectiveness of technology-assisted (T-CET) vs. non-technology-assisted CET (NT-CET).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to March 2023. Two independent authors conducted the study selection using the review management software Covidence. The effectiveness of CET was inspected trough a qualitative synthesis and the quality assessment of all the included studies was performed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, version 2.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine controlled trials were identified (NT-CET; n=21; T-CET: n=18). Compared to active control interventions, CET was found to be more effective in 39% of the studies (n=9/23) that examined cravings, and in 55% of the studies (n=12/22) that examined consumption. CET was most effective when combined with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or CBT-related approaches. T-CET performed better than control interventions more often than NT-CET regarding both cravings (60% vs. 23%) and consumptions (75% vs. 43%), and the findings were more prominent when CET was delivered in virtual reality (VR) format.

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic review demonstrated that CET may be most effective when combined with CBT-related approaches and delivered through T-CET, particularly VR. Future high-quality studies comparing different CET delivery formats are warranted to enable more firm conclusions and quantitative synthesis.

CLINICALTRIAL

The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systemic Reviews (PROSPERO): registration no. CRD42022308806; available at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=308806.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3