What can we Learn from an Electronic Health Diary Campaign?: An observational nested study in the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry (Preprint)

Author:

Sieber ChloéORCID,Chiavi Deborah,Haag Christina,Kaufmann Marco,Horn Andrea B,Dressel Holger,Zecca Chiara,Calabrese Pasquale,Pot Caroline,Kamm Christian P,Von Wyl ViktorORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic health diaries hold promise in complementing standardized surveys in prospective health studies but are fraught with numerous methodological challenges.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate factors associated with response to an electronic health diary campaign in persons with multiple sclerosis, to identify recurrent topics in free text diary entries, and to assess the content validity of structured diary entries regarding current symptoms and medication intake compared with survey collected information.

METHODS

Data were collected by the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry (SMSR) during a nested electronic health diary campaign and during the SMSR baseline assessment (serving as comparative data). The content of diary free text information was grouped using two descriptive natural language processing methods. The similarity between structured diary and survey collected symptom and medication intake data was examined using the Jaccard index.

RESULTS

Campaign participants were more often female, not working full-time, had a more advanced gait impairment, and were on average five years older compared to eligible non-participants. Diary free text entries most often contained references to body parts or body functioning (57.7%), work (56.4%), or health (55.8%). A high similarity between diary and survey collected data was observed for health-related quality of life, and stable or slow-changing symptoms such as fatigue or gait disorder – but not for immunomodulatory medication use.

CONCLUSIONS

Diary campaign participation seemed dependent on time availability and symptom burden, and was enhanced by reminder emails. Electronic health diaries are a meaningful complement to regular structured surveys but should ideally be embedded into promotional activities or tied to concrete research study tasks to enhance regular and long-term participation.

CLINICALTRIAL

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02980640

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3