Disinformation about diet and nutrition in social media. Scoping review (Preprint)

Author:

Segado-Fernández Sergio,Herrera-Peco IvanORCID,Jiménez-Gómez Beatriz,Jiménez Hidalgo Pedro Jesús,Soriano Martin Pedro José,Lozano-Estevan María del Carmen

Abstract

UNSTRUCTURED

Social networks have played an essential role in the dissemination of nutrition-related information for years. Objective: to conduct a review of the international literature on the use of social media in relation to diet and nutrition disinformation. Method: A search was conducted in the following databases: Medline, Web of Science and Scopus. The time frame of this study encompassed articles published from 1st of January 2017 to 13th of December 2022. The search queries were based on the following word structures: Diet ("diet" or "nutrition" OR "nutrition facts"), Information management ("misinformation" OR "disinformation"), Social media ("Twitter" OR "TikTok" OR "Instagram" OR "YouTube" OR "Facebook"). Inclusion criteria were as follows: i) articles written in English, ii) articles published in a peer-reviewed journal, iii) articles that clearly provide the methodology and results, iv) articles in which the researchers used Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, or Facebook to obtain the results, v) articles published from 1st of January 2017 to 1st December 2022. Exclusion criteria were defined as i) non-research articles (editorial letters, comments, pre-prints, abstracts, proceedings, book reviews, etc.), ii) articles not focused on disinformation, iii) articles focused on social networks not listed in the inclusion criteria. Results: A total of 28 articles were included in our review. The most common social media were Instagram and YouTube, with 100% of the articles presenting some form of misinformation. In many cases, the aim was to achieve relevance rather than truthfulness. More specifically, 17 of the articles analyzed advocated miracle diets as a cure for diseases, without any scientific basis. These articles included a large number of diseases such as gout, acne, or orthorexia. Conclusion: Institutions should address misinformation when it poses a threat to public health. Since this is not happening, it is important that healthcare professionals identify themselves as such in social networks and start sharing their knowledge in these new media

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3