Prevention needs and target behavior preferences in an app-based addiction prevention program for German vocational students: A cluster-randomized controlled trial (Preprint)

Author:

Gürtler Diana,Kraft ElaineORCID,Bläsing Dominic,Möhring Anne,Meyer Christian,Brandt Dominique,Schmidt Hannah,Rehbein Florian,Neumann Merten,Dreißigacker Arne,Bischof Anja,Bischof Gallus,Sürig Svenja,Hohls Lisa,Wurm Susanne,Borgwardt Stefan,Haug SeverinORCID,Rumpf Hans-Jürgen

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vocational school students exhibit a high prevalence of addictive behaviors. Digital prevention programs targeting multiple addictive behaviors and promoting life skills are promising. Tailoring intervention content to participants’ preferences, such as allowing them to choose behavior modules, may increase engagement and efficacy. However, there is limited understanding of how personal characteristics relate to module choices and their alignment with prevention needs.

OBJECTIVE

This paper examines the prevention needs of German vocational school students as well as their prevention preferences through self-determined module choice in the multi-behavior app-based addiction prevention program "ready4life".

METHODS

A two-arm cluster-randomized trial recruited German vocational students aged 16+ years. Among 376 classes from 35 schools, "ready4life" was introduced during a school lesson. Students were invited to download the "ready4life" app, and completed an anonymous screening with individualized risk and competence feedback in form of a traffic light system. Informed consent was given by 2568 students. Intervention classes received individual app-based coaching, with weekly chat contacts with a virtual coach over four months. They could choose two out of six modules: alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, social media/gaming, stress and social competencies. Module choice was self-determined. Control group classes received a link to health behavior information and could access coaching after 12 months.

RESULTS

Prevention need was high. For 86% two or more risks were reported according to a yellow or red traffic light feedback. Within the intervention group, stress (818/1236, 66.2%) and social media/gaming (625/1236, 50.6%) were the most chosen topics, followed by alcohol (360/1236, 29.1%), social competencies (306/1236, 24.8%), tobacco (232/1236, 18.8%), and cannabis (131/1236, 10.6%). Module choices closely aligned with received traffic light feedback, particularly among those with one or two risks. Multilevel regression models showed females were significantly more likely to choose the stress module (P<.001; OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.69-3.33), while males preferred social media/gaming (P<.001; OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.40-0.69), alcohol (P<.001; OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.37-0.67) and cannabis (P<.001; OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.21-0.63), when holding age, education track and prevention need for the respective behavior constant. Younger students were significantly more likely to choose the cannabis module (P<.001; OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.90). Educational track also influenced module choice, e.g., health, social affairs, teaching and education tracks had the highest likelihood of choosing the stress module. Students’ prevention needs significantly influenced choice of the corresponding module, e.g., higher alcohol consumption increased the likelihood of choosing the alcohol module (P<.001; OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.20-1.43).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms vocational students' high prevention needs regarding addictive behaviors. A key finding was the high congruence between students' module choices and their demonstrated needs, with most students being interested in the stress module. Module choice also differed by age, gender, and educational track.

CLINICALTRIAL

German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00022328

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT

RR2-https://doi.org/10.1024/0939-5911/a000811

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3