Continued Use of Telehealth In Oncology Patients (Preprint)

Author:

Landau Daniel,Landau Alec

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, telehealth represented a small portion of our oncology practice. Despite offering telehealth availability, fewer than 10% of patients agreed to virtual visits. Administratively, there were concerns about patients’ ability to use the technology, a change in the traditional in office dynamic, questions about whether patients would consistently use these platforms, etc. At the height of the pandemic, as much as 30% of our practice became fully telehealth. As the height of the pandemic has waned, we continue to offer telehealth for both new and establishing patients. We opted to retrospectively look at the continued use of telehealth in our practice.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to determine if patients who did an initial telehealth visit would request future telehealth visits or if they would opt to return to the traditional in office model. Patients treated in 2022 were offered repeat telehealth visits or in person visits by the scheduling staff after their visit. The offer was presented without offering any bias toward future visit.

METHODS

25% of our practice has dedicated telehealth slots. Of patients who opted for a telehealth visit, we followed future visits to determine if they opted to continue use of telehealth technology. We also looked at the age of the patient and the diagnosis of the patient to look for trends.

RESULTS

With a retrospective review of 99 charts, we separated patients into new visits to the cancer center vs patients who were already established. Of the 23 new patient visits, 14 were for a new diagnosis of solid tumor oncology and nine had a hematologic diagnosis. The average age of these patients was 55 (32-80). 13/21 (62%) who had repeat visits did so virtually. Of 76 patients who were already established, 43 had a hematologic diagnosis, 33 a solid tumor diagnosis. The average age was 61 (21-88). 55/76 (72%) opted for repeat telehealth visits. No clear trends in terms of age or diagnosis emerged in terms of who accepted repeat telehealth visits.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients who had an initial telehealth visit, it was likely they would continue to use this technology. Concerns about the age of patient or type of diagnosis did not preclude continued use of telehealth. This supports the continued use of telehealth in the post pandemic setting.

CLINICALTRIAL

None

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3