Breaking the Data Value-Privacy Paradox in Mobile Mental Health Systems Through User-Centered Privacy Protection: A Web-Based Survey Study (Preprint)

Author:

Zhang DongsongORCID,Lim JaewanORCID,Zhou LinaORCID,Dahl Alicia AORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mobile mental health systems (MMHS) have been increasingly developed and deployed in support of monitoring, management, and intervention with regard to patients with mental disorders. However, many of these systems rely on patient data collected by smartphones or other wearable devices to infer patients’ mental status, which raises privacy concerns. Such a value-privacy paradox poses significant challenges to patients’ adoption and use of MMHS; yet, there has been limited understanding of it.

OBJECTIVE

To address the significant literature gap, this research aims to investigate both the antecedents of patients’ privacy concerns and the effects of privacy concerns on their continuous usage intention with regard to MMHS.

METHODS

Using a web-based survey, this research collected data from 170 participants with MMHS experience recruited from online mental health communities and a university community. The data analyses used both repeated analysis of variance and partial least squares regression.

RESULTS

The results showed that data type (<i>P</i>=.003), data stage (<i>P</i>&lt;.001), privacy victimization experience (<i>P</i>=.01), and privacy awareness (<i>P</i>=.08) have positive effects on privacy concerns. Specifically, users report higher privacy concerns for social interaction data (<i>P</i>=.007) and self-reported data (<i>P</i>=.001) than for biometrics data; privacy concerns are higher for data transmission (<i>P</i>=.01) and data sharing (<i>P&lt;</i>.001) than for data collection. Our results also reveal that privacy concerns have an effect on attitude toward privacy protection (<i>P</i>=.001), which in turn affects continuous usage intention with regard to MMHS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study contributes to the literature by deepening our understanding of the data value-privacy paradox in MMHS research. The findings offer practical guidelines for breaking the paradox through the design of user-centered and privacy-preserving MMHS.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3