BACKGROUND
Person-centered care is critical for delivering high-quality diabetes care. Shared decision making (SDM) is central to person-centered care, and in diabetes care, it can improve decision quality, patient knowledge, and patient risk perception. Delivery of person-centered care can be facilitated with the use of patient decision aids (PtDAs). We developed <i>MyDiabetesPlan</i>, an interactive SDM and goal-setting PtDA designed to help individualize care priorities and support an interprofessional approach to SDM.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to assess the impact of <i>MyDiabetesPlan</i> on decisional conflict, diabetes distress, health-related quality of life, and patient assessment of chronic illness care at the individual patient level.
METHODS
A two-step, parallel, 10-site cluster randomized controlled trial (first step: provider-directed implementation only; second step: both provider- and patient-directed implementation 6 months later) was conducted. Participants were adults 18 years and older with diabetes and 2 other comorbidities at 10 family health teams (FHTs) in Southwestern Ontario. FHTs were randomly assigned to <i>MyDiabetesPlan</i> (n=5) or control (n=5) through a computer-generated algorithm. <i>MyDiabetesPlan</i> was integrated into intervention practices, and clinicians (first step) followed by patients (second step) were trained on its use. Control participants received static generic Diabetes Canada resources. Patients were not blinded. Participants completed validated questionnaires at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. The primary outcome at the individual patient level was decisional conflict; secondary outcomes were diabetes distress, health-related quality of life, chronic illness care, and clinician intention to practice interprofessional SDM. Multilevel hierarchical regression models were used.
RESULTS
At the end of the study, the intervention group (5 clusters, n=111) had a modest reduction in total decisional conflicts compared with the control group (5 clusters, n=102; −3.5, 95% CI −7.4 to 0.42). Although there was no difference in diabetes distress or health-related quality of life, there was an increase in patient assessment of chronic illness care (0.7, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.0).
CONCLUSIONS
Use of goal-setting decision aids modestly improved decision quality and chronic illness care but not quality of life. Our findings may be due to a gap between goal setting and attainment, suggesting a role for optimizing patient engagement and behavioral support. The next steps include clarifying the mechanisms by which decision aids impact outcomes and revising <i>MyDiabetesPlan</i> and its delivery.
CLINICALTRIAL
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02379078; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02379078