Thermometer-based fever surveillance and COVID-19 lead time in California, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Texas, November 2021 - March 2022 (Preprint)

Author:

Tonzel Julius LORCID,Sloughy Alicia,Bloch DanielleORCID,Schaffner William

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current public health surveillance infrastructure primarily relies on laboratory reporting of COVID-19 to assess the burden of disease. A combination of limited diagnostic testing capacity, reporting delays, and the increased use of non-reportable at-home tests have hindered the ability to track the spread of COVID-19. Novel epidemiological approaches have been implemented to supplement gaps in the current public health surveillance system.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if there is a lead time and determine the correlation between population-level fever incidence recorded by smartphone-connected thermometers and reported COVID-19 case incidence in five US states

METHODS

To compare the incidence curves of fever-based surveillance and reported COVID-19 cases from November 2, 2021 - March 30, 2022 in five states, we compared their respective maxima (“peak-to-peak” analysis) and conducted a cross-correlation analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 276,981 temperatures were recorded in the study population, of which 48,091 were febrile and the plurality of which were from California. Using both the peak-to-peak analysis and cross correlation analysis, fever incidence preceded COVID-19 cases in all five states. For the peak-to-peak method, lead times ranged from 2 (Texas) to 15 days (Ohio). In the cross-correlation analysis, lead time ranged from 6 to 8 days, with Ohio having the shortest lead time and New York, Pennsylvania, and Texas having the longest. Fever incidence and reported COVID-19 cases were highly correlated in all five states (r ≥ 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Thermometer-based fever incidence consistently produced a lead time with a high correlation of COVID-19 cases in the five states that were studied. In conjunction with early warning and laboratory diagnostic data, these results can inform health policies and resource allocation of vaccines and testing. Future studies can analyze lead time in other states and scales of geography, compare fever surveillance to other surveillance sources, and stratify fever data by age, gender, and race and/or ethnicity, if available, to identify any sentinel groups.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3