Development of a Regional Digital Health Record for Geriatric Health Care in Rural Areas: Community-Based Participatory Research Approach (Preprint)

Author:

Pfeuffer NilsORCID,Beyer AngelikaORCID,Penndorf Peter,Leiz MarenORCID,Radicke FranziskaORCID,van den Berg NeeltjeORCID,Hoffmann WolfgangORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Geriatric patients are often treated by several healthcare providers at the same time. The spatial, informational, and organizational separation of these healthcare providers can hinder an effective treatment of geriatric patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop a regional Digital Health Record (abbreviated in German as ReDiFa) in order to improve health information exchange in geriatric treatment. This study also evaluated the usability of ReDiFa and seeks to identify barriers and facilitators for its implementation.

METHODS

The development of ReDiFa followed the Community-Based Participatory Research Approach (CBPR) and involved various geriatric healthcare professionals in all stages of development: identification of suitable regions for later implementation, identification of regional stakeholders, identifying specific, regional needs, development of a content concept, programming and testing of ReDiFa. Primary outcomes were usability of ReDiFa, expected implementation barriers and facilitators and the quality of the developmental process. Data were collected and analyzed by using a mixed-method approach.

RESULTS

3 focus regions were identified, 22 geriatric healthcare providers participated in the development of ReDiFa and 11 workshops were conducted between October 2019 and September 2020. 12 participants responded to a questionnaire. Main results were, that ReDiFa should support the exchange of assessments, diagnoses, medication, assistive device supply and social information. The ReDiFa was expected to be able to improve the quality and continuity of care. Main barriers expected for implementation were: lack of resources, interoperability issues, computer illiteracy, lack of trust, privacy concerns, and ease-of-use issues.

CONCLUSIONS

Participating healthcare professionals share similar motivations for developing ReDiFa including improved quality of care, reduction of unnecessary examinations, and more effective healthcare provision. An overly complicated registration process for healthcare professionals and the patients' free choice of their healthcare providers hinder the effectiveness of ReDiFa and result in incomplete patient health information. However, the web-based design of ReDiFa bridges interoperability problems which exists due to different technical and organizational structures of the involved healthcare facilities. ReDiFa is better accepted by healthcare professionals which are already engaged in an inter-disciplinary, geriatric-focused network. This might indicate that pre-existing cross-organisational structures and processes are prerequisites for using health information exchange systems. The participatory design supports the development of technologies adaptable to regional needs. Healthcare providers are interested in participating in the development of a health information exchange system, but they often lack the required time, knowledge and resources.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3