Physician, General Public and Media Opinion Leader Posts Regarding Physician-patient Conflicts on Microblog: A Comparative Content Analysis (Preprint)

Author:

Gong WanqiORCID,Guo QinORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physician–patient conflicts in China have increased more than ten times from the 2000s to the 2020 and arouse heated discussions on microblog. The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic is believed to have brought a turnaround in the physician–patient relationship. However, little is known about the similarities and differences among the views of opinion leaders from the general public, physicians, and media regarding physician–patient conflict incidents on microblog, and whether the outbreak had an impact on this.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore how opinion leaders from the physicians, general public, and media framed posts on major physician–patient conflict incidents on microblog. The findings will provide more objective evidence of the attitudes and perspectives of the health professionals, general public, and media on physician–patient conflicts, and the influence of pandemics on physician–patient relationship.

METHODS

A comparative content analysis was conducted to examine the posts (N=941) of microblog opinion leaders regarding major physician–patient conflicts in China from 2012 to 2020.

RESULTS

Post- pandemic posts used more cooperation (M pre-pandemic = 0.046, M post-pidemic = 0.347, p<.001) and positive frame (M pre-pandemic = 0.247, M post-pandemic = 0.613, p<.001), but less attribution frame (M pre-pandemic = 0.345, M post-pandemic = 0.261, p=0.016) and health knowledge promotion (M pre-pandemic = 0.116, M post-pandemic = 0.015, p<.001), and no differences were found regarding conflict and negative frame. Media opinion leaders used more conflict (M = 0.146), cooperation (M = 0.066), attribution (M = 0.162), and positive frame (M = 0.367); and less negative frame (M = 0.189), and health knowledge promotion (M = 0.021) than physician and general public opinion leaders.

CONCLUSIONS

The physician and general public opinion leaders share some similarity in their post frames, implying that no fundamental discrepancy exists among them regarding physician–patient conflict incidents. However, the imbalanced use of frames by media would cultivate and reinforce the public perception of physician–patient contradictions. After the COVID-19 pandemic, more cooperation and positive frames were used in the posts, indicating an improvement in the physician–patient relationship in China.

CLINICALTRIAL

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3