Challenges with the Use of Digital Sham: A Systematic Review and Recommendations (Preprint)

Author:

Bos Ernst,Preller Katrin H.,Kaur Gavneet,Malhotra Pooja,Kharawala Saifuddin,Motti Dario

Abstract

UNSTRUCTURED

Digital therapeutics (DTx) are software-based products that prevent, manage, or treat a medical condition, and are delivered through a smartphone app, web application or wearable. Clinical trials assessing DTx pose challenges, foremost amongst which is designing appropriate ‘digital shams’ (or ‘digital placebos’), which should ideally mimic the DTx (in terms of design, components and duration of treatment) while omitting the active principle/component. To understand how digital shams are being used in clinical research on DTx, we conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) of DTx in neuroscience (including neurodevelopmental, neurodegenerative, and psychiatric disorders) with a focus on controlled clinical trials involving digital shams. Our search criteria identified 461 neuroscience studies involving 213 unique DTx. Most DTx were extended reality-based (40.4%) or mobile device-based (26.3%); 313 were comparative, of which 68 used shams. The most common therapeutic areas assessed in these studies were stroke (19.7%), depression (15%) and anxiety (11.3%); and the most common treatments were cognitive behavioral therapy/behavioral therapy (32.4%), physical rehabilitation (28.2%), and cognitive training (19.2%). Results: We identified the following important issues related to the use of digital shams: shams were not validated prior to use in studies; they varied widely in design; (from being near-identical to the DTx to using different software programs altogether); the level of patient engagement/satisfaction with the sham and the impact of the sham on study outcomes was infrequently reported. Conclusions: Digital shams are critical to the clinical development of DTx. Given the importance of sham controls in evaluating DTx efficacy, we provide recommendations on the key information that should be reported in a well-designed DTx trial and propose an algorithm to allow correct interpretation of DTx study results. Sham-controlled studies should be routinely used in DTx trials – in early phase studies, to help identify DTx active components, and in late-phase studies, to confirm the efficacy of DTx. Use of shams early in development will ensure that the appropriate sham control is used in later confirmatory trials.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3