Spatial Analyses of Crisis Pregnancy Centers and Abortion Facilities in the United States, 2021 (Preprint)

Author:

Swartzendruber AndreaORCID,Luisi Nicole,Johnson Erin,Lambert Danielle NicoleORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) are religious non-profit organizations that have a primary mission of diverting people from having abortions. For decades, one tactic used by CPCs has been to locate near abortion facilities. Despite medical groups’ warnings that CPCs do not adhere to medical and ethical standards and pose risks to individual and public health, government support for CPCs has significantly increased over the past decade.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to map CPCs, abortion facilities, and geographic areas in the United States (US) categorized into four zones defined by their proximity to CPCs and abortion facilities in 2021. We also sought to describe the number and percentage of reproductive-aged women living in each zone and the proximity of CPCs to abortion facilities.

METHODS

Using 2021 data from CPC Map and the Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH) Abortion Facility Database, we determined the ratio of CPCs to abortion facilities. Using these sources and Census data, we categorized and mapped US block groups into four distinct zones based on the locations of block group centroids within 15-mile radii of CPCs and abortion facilities: 1) no presence, 2) CPC only, 3) abortion facility only, and 4) dual presence. We used summary statistics to calculate the number and percentage of block groups and reproductive-aged (15-49 years) women living in each zone. We also calculated distances and drive times from abortion facilities to the nearest CPC. All analyses were conducted nationally and by region, division, and state. We used chi-square statistics to test for differences by region and division in the number of block groups and women classified to each zone.

RESULTS

Nationally, the ratio of CPCs to abortion facilities was 3.4, and 55% of block groups were categorized in the “dual presence” zone, 27% as “CPC only,” and 0.8% in the “abortion facility only” zone. Most (60%) reproductive-aged women lived in a “dual presence” zone, 26% in a “CPC only”, and 0.8% lived in an “abortion facility only” zone. We detected statistically significant variations (p<0.001) in the number of block groups and women classified as living in each zone by region and division. Nationally, the median distance from abortion facilities to the nearest CPC was 2 miles, and the median drive time was 5.5 minutes. Minimum drive times were <1 minute in all but 11 states.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that CPCs’ tactic of locating near abortion facilities was largely realized before the 2022 US Supreme Court decision that overturned the federal right to abortion. Research on CPCs’ locations and tactics should continue given the dynamic abortion policy landscape and risks posed by CPCs. Tailored programming to raise awareness about CPCs and help people identify and access safe sources of healthcare may mitigate harm.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3