How medical journals use Twitter: metadata, network, and content analyses (Preprint)

Author:

Kim DonghunORCID,Jung WoojinORCID,Jiang TingORCID,Zhu YongjunORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of medical journals are using social media to promote themselves and to communicate with their readers. However, little is known about how medical journals use Twitter and what their social media management strategies are.

OBJECTIVE

To understand how medical journals use of Twitter from a global standpoint, we conducted a broad, in-depth analysis of all the available Twitter accounts of medical journals indexed by major indexing services, with a particular focus on their social networks and content.

METHODS

The Twitter profiles and metadata of medical journals were analyzed, along with the social networks on their Twitter accounts.

RESULTS

The results showed that overall, publishers used different strategies regarding Twitter adoption, Twitter usage patterns, and their subsequent decisions. The following specific findings were noted. 1) Journals with Twitter accounts had a significantly higher number of publications and a greater impact than their counterparts. 2) Subscription journals had a slightly higher (2%) Twitter adoption rate than open access journals. 3) Journals with higher impact had more followers. 4) Prestigious journals rarely followed other lesser-known journals on social media. Additionally, an in-depth analysis of 2,000 randomly selected tweets from four prestigious journals revealed that The Lancet had dedicated considerable effort to communicating with people about health information and fulfilling its social responsibility by organizing committees and activities to engage with a broad range of health-related issues; The New England Journal of Medicine and the Journal of the American Medical Association focused on promoting research articles and attempting to maximize the visibility of their research articles; while the British Medical Journal provided copious amounts of health information and discussed various health-related social problems to increase social awareness of the field of medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study used various perspectives to investigate how medical journals use Twitter and explored the Twitter management strategies of four of the most prestigious journals. Our study provides a detailed understanding of medical journals’ use of Twitter from various perspectives and can help publishers, journals, and researchers better utilize Twitter for their respective purposes.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3