BACKGROUND
It is estimated that 88% of Ontario physicians still use fax technology to share patient information. Transitioning to eReferral has been shown to have numerous benefits, but the major barrier to eReferral adoption is the need to have both sending/receiving clinicians on the same platform to enable information sharing. The traditional onboarding process takes time and effort. An innovative method is required to improve eReferral adoption by bridging the gap between eReferral senders and referral receivers still using fax.
OBJECTIVE
To explore the technological feasibility of leveraging a Business Automation Workflow (BAW) platform to connect the digital (eReferral) and non-digital referral platform (Fax), enabling eReferral senders to use eReferral to send referrals to clinicians using Fax, with the goal of improving clinician experience.
METHODS
An eReferral via eFax solution was developed and evaluated on the BAW platform to connect the eReferral platform and the clinicians using fax. A selected number of fax receivers were identified and enabled on the eReferral platform as eFax receivers. Sending clinicians initiated eFaxes through the familiar eReferral workflow, with eFaxes transmitted to BAW and delivered to the target receiver via fax. Retry and reminder logic were built to improve the user experience. If the eFax failed after all the retries, a message was sent to the sending clinician through the eReferral platform explaining the failure reason. The appointment information was entered into the eReferral platform by the sending clinicians to trigger patient email notifications. Surveys and focused interviews were conducted to collect clinicians’ feedback.
RESULTS
From May 2022 to December 2023, 224 eFax receivers were enabled on the platform, processing 4,504 eFaxes for 4,132 unique patients and 843 unique senders across the province. Nearly 70% of patients received email notifications, with 19% of appointment details entered in the eReferral platform. On average, eFax referrals contained 5.6 pages, with a minimal 0.7% exceeding 30 pages.
Initially, fax service retries were disabled to observe delivery error rates. This resulted in a 37.7% fax failure. However, after implementing new retry logic in March 2023, the failure rate dropped significantly to 9.9% and 98.7% of eFaxes were successfully delivered after automatic retries. Clinician feedback revealed a positive impact on sending clinicians' experience, maintaining their familiar workflow while accommodating fax-reliant receivers who can gradually transition to the new platform at their own pace.
CONCLUSIONS
This project demonstrates the potential of the BAW platform to bridge the gap between fax and eReferral systems. It minimizes disruption for sending clinicians while allowing receiving clinicians using fax to incrementally adopt the new platform. This technology can significantly expedite eReferral adoption by reducing reliance on the adoption of the eReferral by receiving clinics, ultimately enhancing the experience for both clinicians and patients.